CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Cell size for solidification/melting multiphase problem

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   December 14, 2022, 11:30
Default Cell size for solidification/melting multiphase problem
  #1
New Member
 
Sebastien
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
sfawn is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

I am currently running some simulations of a multiphase problem including a solid metal phase and an argon phase.
I've turned on the solidification and melting module and have an energy soruce term that turns on and off to allow solidification and melting of my materials.

Previously, while simulating an aluminium alloy with cell size of 3 μm^3, everything was ok as the solidification range was quite wide.

I am now trying to do the same simulation with a stainless steel alloy which has a really narrow solidification range (between 1658 and 1723 K), and, although it is overall ok, as you can see on the attached graph (I plotted the liquid fraction against the temperature for where the metal volume fraction is equal to 1), I am unsure of the accuracy of the mushy zone (the metal between the solidus and liquidus temperature, corresponding to the two green lines on the attached figure), as the range is really narrow regarding the cell size (the cells are 6 μm^3 cuboids)

I'd love to have your opinion, if the cell size need to be decreased to capture the evolution of the liquid fraction in the mushy zone or if it is still ok

Thanks a lot in advance !
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fl_vs_T_ststeel2.JPG (26.3 KB, 8 views)
File Type: png zoom.png (68.8 KB, 9 views)
sfawn is offline   Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Error in enabling the python wrapper Jinn SU2 Installation 2 April 23, 2022 13:52
[snappyHexMesh] Problem: after snappyHexMesh, the cells size are not the same kanes OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 January 25, 2016 08:06
Problem with geometry - concentric cylinders Rhoddwen OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 December 15, 2014 09:22
FvMatrix coefficients shrina OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 10 October 3, 2013 14:38
Warning 097- AB Siemens 6 November 15, 2004 04:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21.