|
[Sponsors] |
exploding convergence with every boundary condition |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Lynn S.
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Dear friends of CFD-online,
for a project, I am trying to convert a steady-state hotflow to a transient hotflow. Second-order discretization didn't meet the convergence requirements, so I switched to first-order to see the convergence potential. Now, in every simulation, the continuity, k and omega residuals explode at some point. I have tried different solvers (coupled and PISO) in combination with different turbulent boundary conditions (k-omega, intensity & viscosity, intensity & hydraulic diameter). Some explode later than others, but eventually, they all do. Do you have any suggestions on how to solve this problem? Thankyou so much in advance, Lynn |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Kareem
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: New York
Posts: 141
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Divergence in transient simulations are usually the result of using too large of a time step or having a mesh with poor quality. If the same mesh/set-up solved well in steady state then I would suspect your timestep for the transient is too large.
__________________
Please like the answer if it helped! Video Tutorials and Tips: https://www.youtube.com/@cfdkareem/featured |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Lynn S.
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Hi Kareem,
thank you for your reply. I reduced the time step and up till now, it has not exploded. I was thinking, might a CFL-based (CFL of 0.8 for example) timestep be more efficient, rather than arbitrarily reducing the timestep? Thank you again, Lynn |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Kareem
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: New York
Posts: 141
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Yes, trying to match your timestep to keep the CFL number under 1 is the most efficient technique. You can use the automatic time stepping which lets you set a CFL number and the timestep will update accordingly. This will allow the simulation to run at the highest possible timestep at each point and speed up your simulation time.
__________________
Please like the answer if it helped! Video Tutorials and Tips: https://www.youtube.com/@cfdkareem/featured |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Member
Lynn S.
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Thank you again. The smaller fixed time (reduced with factor 4) has only delayed the explosion. It is always the continuity, k, and omega that explode. Before the explosion, the simulation converges.
Isn't it more likely that there is something unstable in the model itself, especially regarding the turbulence (based on the k and omega involved in the explosion)? I have tried different turbulence boundary settings, but they all explode at some point. Can a change in the viscous model resolve this? Or any other ideas? Thank you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Kareem
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: New York
Posts: 141
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Please like the answer if it helped! Video Tutorials and Tips: https://www.youtube.com/@cfdkareem/featured |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
boundary conditions, convergence, explosion, turbulence |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Change of boundary condition value (mole fraction) of species after convergence | Anshul7 | FLUENT | 0 | February 6, 2021 06:21 |
Time dependant pressure boundary condition | yosuke1984 | OpenFOAM Verification & Validation | 3 | May 6, 2015 06:16 |
Radiation interface | hinca | CFX | 15 | January 26, 2014 17:11 |
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | volo87 | CFX | 5 | June 14, 2013 17:44 |
External Radiation Boundary Condition for Grid Interface | CFD XUE | FLUENT | 0 | July 9, 2010 02:53 |