|
[Sponsors] |
'pdf_stability_marker' in Non-Premix Combustion calculations |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 29, 2023, 11:26 |
'pdf_stability_marker' in Non-Premix Combustion calculations
|
#1 |
Member
|
Hello FLUENT Users,
Recently ANSYS has added 'pdf_stability_marker' option in GUI with respect to one which was available since earlier times. After going through documentation this is what mentioned about this 'pdf_stability_marker': In FLUENT User guide 19.1.13. Enabling Robust Numerics for Combustion with a PDF Table You may be able to increase the robustness of combustion simulations that use a PDF table by applying poor mesh numerics during the calculation. When you initialize or read data for a case with non-premixed or partially premixed combustion, a cell register named pdf_stability_marker is created (which marks cells where the enthalpy—as defined by the PDF Table Heat Loss/Gain field variable described in Alphabetical Listing of Field Variables and Their Definitions—is below the minimum PDF table value), and this cell register is used as part of the settings for a register-based definition named pmn_pdf_stability_marker that applies poor mesh numerics treatment every 5 iterations (for steady cases) or every 2 time steps (for unsteady cases). Note that this definition is automatically created, but is deactivated by default; in order to use it in the current session of Fluent, you must enter the following text command prior to running the calculation: Code:
> solve/set/poor-mesh-numerics/register-based/edit pmn_pdf_stability_marker active? yes Note that if the default settings for this treatment are not appropriate for your case, you can edit the cell register and/or register-based definition for poor mesh numerics, as described in Manage Cell Registers and Robustness with Meshes of Poor Quality, respectively. I still didn't understand correctly can anyone explain me how to use it correctly by default value for 'cells having less than' option is -1, what should I mentioned instead of -1 or is it correctly defined? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OpenFoam Combustion SIG | dlahaye | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 0 | August 14, 2023 11:39 |
Ansys CFX problem: unexpected very high temperatures in premix laminar combustion | faizan_habib7 | CFX | 4 | February 1, 2016 17:00 |
Non-premixed/Partial Premix combustion Operating pressure | raymond350 | FLUENT | 6 | June 19, 2013 21:21 |
modeling non premix combustion | Sajedi | FLUENT | 0 | July 2, 2012 03:23 |
XiFoam partially premix combustion | tavasoly | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 1, 2008 11:01 |