CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Does temperature limiter cause solver blow up ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 22, 2023, 10:11
Default Does temperature limiter cause solver blow up ?
New Member
Adithya Ajay
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 2
Adithya Ajay is on a distinguished road
I know this is a frequent question in the forum. But...
I am running a supersonic nozzle simulation. To keep my Y+ near 1, I am giving a very small first cell thickness, and cells above these have it,s height gradually increased. Hence my aspect ratios are somewhat high near the outlet.
I am extending my external domain to give accurate boundary conditions. While running density-based simulations, after soo many iterations temperature is getting limited to 5000K which is not possible physically in my case. But since these high temperatures are not in my area of interest I am neglecting it. But after many iterations floating point errors are arising.All mesh parameters are good ( Min orthogonal quality >0.9, Max skewness < 0.2, Aspect ratio max:333 !!!) My doubts are :

1. Are these temperature limits causing the solver to blow up?
2. I am defining convergence based on net mass imbalance (inflow - outflow)/inflow to be less than 1 % even though my residuals are still in the range of 10^-2 or 10^-3 ( they are oscillating at that range). I am also putting markers around the domain at different locations and plotting velocity against iterations. Is this approach okay?

Thank you in advance for the reply.

I am posting the image where AR is high and temperature is getting limited. I only care about the inlet ,not on the external domain !!)
Attached Images
File Type: png Screenshot 2023-12-22 205107.png (37.3 KB, 6 views)

Last edited by Adithya Ajay; December 22, 2023 at 10:25. Reason: To input more information
Adithya Ajay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2023, 15:44
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,678
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Yes limiters can exacerbate some problems. >5000K is not physical but once you apply the limiters, now you have jump conditions and super large gradients in the simulation which are even more unphysical.

For example you might say that the maximum temperature expected in my simulation is 300 K and limit the max temperature to 300 K, thinking it is the "physically correct" thing to do. But do so and your simulation blows up even faster.

Don't worry about addressing the symptoms, fix the problem.
Adithya Ajay likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 24, 2023, 15:34
Default Solutions
New Member
Adithya Ajay
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 2
Adithya Ajay is on a distinguished road
As you can see my mesh metrics except A.R is okay (I think). What else can I do to avoid this large temperature ?
And what's your opinion about the convergence technique in question
Adithya Ajay is offline   Reply With Quote


convergence criteria, floating point error, supersonic internal flows, temperature limited

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CHT transient solver not converged beacuse of temperature dependent density KKlee OpenFOAM 1 March 1, 2022 09:21
Custom BC (Temperature, cyclic) in compressible solver (rhoSimpleFOAM) crashing memento OpenFOAM Programming & Development 0 February 14, 2022 06:10
Error SIGSEGV using VOF and UDF JERC_UTFSM Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 14 November 7, 2021 23:17
Divergence in AMG solver: Temperature Alex07 FLUENT 0 June 17, 2015 15:03
divergence detected in amg solver temperature increasing relaxation sweeps Kashif Rashid FLUENT 3 May 3, 2014 06:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29.