CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

grid for laminar flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Chetan Kadakia

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 3, 2002, 12:28
Default grid for laminar flow
Posts: n/a
What is the recommendation for building grid in laminar flow ? In turbulent flow there is the well known restriction for the distance of the first cell expressed by y+ value. But how careful do I have to be when the flow is laminar ? Is it only a problem of numerical accuracy or are there any other limitations ? Thanks for your comments.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2002, 15:57
Default Re: grid for laminar flow
Chetan Kadakia
Posts: n/a
In answer to your question, such a restriction for the laminar case does not exist. There will only be a problem of numerical inaccuracy if you have much too many cells, but for most laminar flows you should not need to have such a high density mesh to obtain grid independence.

The reason there is a recommended minimum distance of y+ when using turbulence models is that the near wall functions are only accurate in certain areas.

Remember when flow is turbulent, the boundary layer has 3 layers. Each layer differs in evaluation.

The near wall functions, depending on which one is selected has equations that work well for certain layers of the boundary layer but not for the others.

In the laminar case, the boundary layer is evaluated the same throughout. Therefore the Navier-Stokes Equation, as applied throughout your domain, will be accurate for the laminar boundary layer.

You should have enough cells in the boundary layer to observe the velocity gradient/profile of the layer. That means at least 10 cells perpindicular to the wall . If you increase to a 100 cells perpindicular to the wall you should get even more accurate results. As you increase the number of cells, accuracy obviously increases. But if you have too many cells, numerical error can be a factor, but that is probably not your worry. Just adapt the boundary and check to see if the change in the grid has caused a change in your solution. Hence start with less cells and iterate and adapt until you have grid independence.

Need more help, or further clarification, just ask.

Jiss likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2002, 02:44
Default Re: grid for laminar flow
Posts: n/a
Thanks Chetan
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
code for SIMPLE algorithm - 2D Lid driven cavity flow problem - Collocated grid h_amooie OpenFOAM Programming & Development 1 January 22, 2022 11:33
Grid independent problem for lid-driven flow dpc-buaa Main CFD Forum 0 February 22, 2011 22:24
Unstructured grid problem - Laminar flow pipe Roby FLUENT 0 January 12, 2006 05:54
Combustion Convergence problems Art Stretton Phoenics 5 April 2, 2002 05:59
computation about flow around a yawed cone Tylor Xie Main CFD Forum 0 June 9, 1999 07:33

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:09.