|
[Sponsors] |
June 4, 2002, 14:23 |
Lid driven cavity flow
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
For the classic lid driven cavity flow - laminar flow - I first modeled the lid as a moving wall boundary, which gave quite good results & convergence rate.
Now I am trying to vary the lid speed, which is not possible in FLUENT, so I changed the lid to a velocity boundary specifying the 3 velocity components and found it takes a really long time to converge, and the results are different. Can somebody explain why there is such big difference for the flow inside cavity (Re=100), the above two ways of modeling should give the same results?? |
|
December 16, 2009, 19:10 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Kimi Raikkonen
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Could you tell me the results after your studying? I mean if you compare the results after you improve the speed of lids what is happening?
Because I will start to do the experimental work of it.. selcukatalay@hotmail.com Thanks.. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lid Driven Cavity using Ghost Cell Method and in C++ | illuminati5288 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 12, 2011 23:05 |
Scalar transport in Lid driven cavity | CFDtoy | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 19, 2011 10:43 |
2D LID driven cavity | reeshav | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 12, 2010 02:51 |
Lid Driven Cavity Problem | Ravi Shankar | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 17, 2006 09:37 |
InterFoam with lid driven cavity | billy | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | July 13, 2005 16:44 |