|
[Sponsors] |
September 24, 2003, 22:25 |
how to define particle tracked number
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Now I am trying to calculate the trajectories of the ultra fine particles in the ESP. The DPM, surface injection type, when I specicfied the particle distribution RR fit, and the iterations are terribly slow! The particle tracked number is around 600 and the results don't make sense either.
Is there any way to change the tracked number?, or there are other factors I neglectd which ruined my calculations? Your idea will be appreciated! Ke |
|
September 27, 2003, 12:12 |
Re: how to define particle tracked number
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi: After reading the menu, I found that the number is related to the mash faces and the diameter defined in the injection property.
Anyway, I got the answer for the calculation. Good weekend! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to define the Reynolds Number in CFX? | yflin | CFX | 27 | November 24, 2018 04:20 |
[mesh manipulation] Mesh Refinement | Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio (Sampaio) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 42 | January 8, 2017 12:55 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 21:11 |
Problem with decomposePar tool | vinz | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 18 | January 26, 2011 02:17 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 04:15 |