CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

UDF Boundary Condition

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 3, 2003, 04:50
Default UDF Boundary Condition
Posts: n/a

I need to create two UDF boundary conditions at an interface; one for the flux and one for the scalar. Im actually looking at a mass transfer problem but in order to get some feedback I have begun with a temperature problem and compared my result with the one obtained using FLUENTS built-in functions. The UDF code is as follows:

/*B.C. Solidface q = -k*(dT/ds)**********************/

DEFINE_PROFILE(Diff_Flux, t, i)


face_t f;

cell_t c1;

Thread *t1;

real xc[ND_ND], xf[ND_ND], grad, dn;



c1 = F_C1(f,t);

t1 = THREAD_T1(t);



dn = sqrt(ND_SUM(pow(xc[0]-xf[0],2.),pow(xc[1]-xf[1],2.),pow(xc[2]-xf[2],2.)));

grad = (F_T(f,t)-C_T(c1,t1))/dn;

F_PROFILE(f,t,i) = -0.0242*grad;




/************************************************** **/

/*B.C. Bulkface Tbulkface = Tsolidface***************/



face_t fbulk, fsolid;

Domain *doma;

Thread *tsolid;

real xfbulk[ND_ND], xfsolid[ND_ND];

int ID;

doma = Get_Domain(1);

ID = 10; /*Zone ID for the solid face*/

tsolid = Lookup_Thread(doma,ID);







if (xfsolid[0]==xfbulk[0] && xfsolid[1]==xfbulk[1] && xfsolid[2]==xfbulk[2])


F_PROFILE(fbulk,t,i) = F_T(fsolid,tsolid);







/************************************************** **/

This UDF is working fine with one exception. My problem is that FLUENT in every iteration make use of the boundary condition for the scalar (i.e. Tbulkface = Tsolidface) before the boundary condition for the flux (i.e. q = -k*(dT/ds)). I want it to be the other way around!

So my question is: How can I force FLUENT to first make use of the boundary condition for the flux and then the one for the scalar?

If anybody knows the answer or at least have some suggestion, please share it with me!

Thanks! /Victor
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2003, 10:47
Default Re: UDF Boundary Condition
Ajay Rao
Posts: n/a
Instead of using two UDF's ,you could merge both in one. Use the one name have "two" FACE_LOOP's first one apply q = -k*(dT/ds) in the next face_loop apply Tbulkface = Tsolidface

Regards, Ajay
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2003, 11:37
Default Re: UDF Boundary Condition
Posts: n/a
Thank you very much for your respons Ajay! Sadly, I dont think that your suggestion will work with my problem. I have realised that I was not that informative about my problem in my first message. I forgot to mention that the interface between the solid and the liquid contains of two faces (wall and shadow wall). This means that I have to put one boundary condition at the wall adjacent to the fluid (or bulk) cells (Tbulkface = Tsolidface) and one at the wall adjacent to the solid cells (q = -k*(dT/ds)) hence I need two different DEFINE_PROFILE macros to be activated in the boundary condition panel. So I guess that my problem still remains...

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Resolved: Changing boundary condition with UDF according to pressure outlet boundary alpemre Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 12 February 24, 2014 10:18
UDF for inhomogenous Neumann boundary condition akhilesh Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 3 December 24, 2012 11:14
Boundary Condition Types Using Scheme and UDF Nasir FLUENT 0 September 15, 2008 21:54
UDF for the boundary condition Sridhar FLUENT 3 July 13, 2001 19:18
UDF : boundary condition ID Flav FLUENT 4 June 28, 2001 09:52

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47.