|
[Sponsors] |
Pre-mixed combustion- Laminar finite rate model |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello all,
I am dealing with pre-mixed combustion in a closed chamber.After defining the chemical mechanism and activating all the reactions, I have a small zone in the centre of the chamber where I patch the temperature to be above the ignition temperature(which is equivalent to an electric spark). The reaction mechanism is defined based on the literature available for this particular mixture of fuel. But I am not getting convergence. Is there anything wrong with the way I am starting the reactions? I have floating operating pressure for this kind of premixed combustion inside a closed chamber.The geometry is simple(cube) and so are the boundary conditions. I couldnt find this paper in our library, does anybody have this: Westbrook, C.K. and Dryer F.L., (1981) "Simplified Reaction Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuels in Flames" CST, 27, pp.31-43 Thanks and Regards, Shankar. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Use the coupled solver
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi CG,
I am using coupled solver only. I think thats the default option in FLUENT? ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i don't think coupled is default option in fluent. check again.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks to both of you, 'coupled' is not the default option in FLUENT, but it seems like if I use 'coupled', I cannot use floating operating pressure?
Shankar. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
one more thing i do have the paper u mentioned but there is a problem, i am in portugal and i left the paper in india, i only have the appendix here in which reaction mechanism is given, if you want that i can scan that and send you
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Zxaar,
That would be awesome if you could e-mail it to me. Thanks, Shankar. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Using the coupled solver did not solve the problem. I get the following error: 'couldnt allocate the fine level co-efficient matrix'. Any idea whats wrong?
Shankar. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i also do have the same experience, but to my surprize for the same case and same boundary conditions sometimes it works without complaining, i have found similar case with edc, i mean i have same grid same boundary conditions and same chem mech file, in one case it runs without a prob, in other it gives me some failure. i am not able to sort it out.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 40 | January 27, 2023 07:18 |
Problem on EDC model for coal combustion | lei | FLUENT | 4 | September 3, 2015 09:39 |
finite rate mutistep combustion | torn | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 24, 2015 23:19 |
Liquid rocket engine non-premixed combustion model | Erik | FLUENT | 2 | November 28, 2013 14:09 |
Laminar Model | danillocafaldo | CFX | 5 | August 16, 2010 10:43 |