CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

K-Epsilon troublesome

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 10, 2004, 08:19
Default K-Epsilon troublesome
  #1
Brenda
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am simulating a fully turbulent flow inside a bifurcated pipe with the K_Epsilon model and Near wall equilibrium Function.

But I have noticed after doing the balance of Mass and Total Energy that the total energy is not conserved. Moreover there is a great amount of total energy created inside my domain.

What is happening? Why?

Thanks in advance.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 10, 2004, 09:57
Default Re: K-Epsilon troublesome
  #2
se
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Are you sure about the way you looked at the energy conservation? Have you counted everything? Borrowing the analogy of sugar cubes I read about in a thermodynamics book, have you counted the sugar cubes that your child ate and ones he threw out of the window? More possibly, by any chance, is your conclusion based on the observation that the total energy (or total pressure) locally (at some cells) exceeds the averaged inlet total energy (or rpessure)? If you are, you're not correctly understanding what the energy conservation is about.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 10, 2004, 15:42
Default Re: K-Epsilon troublesome
  #3
Brenda
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have checked it with Fluent. It gives you the surface integral along inlet/outlet sections:

Mass Flow Rate (kg/s) -------------------------------- --------------------

inlet 17.340075

outlet_primary -17.250082

Net 0.08999189

Mass-Weighted Average

Total Energy (j/kg) -------------------------------- --------------------

inlet 180861.2

outlet_primary 182157.09

Net 181507.45

That's what I obtained.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 10, 2004, 16:04
Default Re: K-Epsilon troublesome
  #4
se
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You haven't counted the sugar cubes your children ate.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 14, 2004, 14:39
Default Re: K-Epsilon troublesome
  #5
Brenda
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Maybe I haven't count how stupid you are.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 14, 2004, 20:03
Default Re: K-Epsilon troublesome
  #6
se
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This is a little too harsh for someone trying to help you My apology if I annoyed you. Maybe I should've been more direct.

What I was trying to say was that you did not count the work done by the fluid against wall-shear and volumetric dissipation of energy, which drains the energy from the flow. You counted the energy-in and energy-out only. Checking conservation of "conserved" variables is a good idea. However, please keep in mind that the velocity field obtained by solving the momentum equations does not necessarily conserve energy unless you solve the equation for total energy.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 15, 2004, 11:22
Default Re: K-Epsilon troublesome
  #7
Brenda
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks, I like that very much. Sorry for my last reply.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 16 March 4, 2017 08:30
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence jonmec OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 July 28, 2011 05:24
How to get reference to k and epsilon in the epsEqn and kEqn cfd_explorer OpenFOAM Programming & Development 0 March 10, 2011 10:16
How to get reference to k and epsilon in the epsEqn and kEqn cfd_explorer OpenFOAM 0 March 10, 2011 09:58
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 November 25, 2008 20:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:31.