CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

EDC, PDF transport and turbulent combustion

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   March 15, 2005, 07:05
Default EDC, PDF transport and turbulent combustion
  #1
HP
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi. I have used the non-premixed combustion model to simulate coal combustion in PF burner. The assumption of the chemical equillibrium was acceptable for my case, but I had other problems due to the 2 mixture fractions restriction (I can give more information on this). Therefore I would like to upgrade the combustion model I use, to EDC or PDF transport, but I am not quite sure, which are their main differences and which model is more suitable for my case (coal combustion).

Could anybody with experience on these models give me some guidelines?

PS. The computational cost of the two mixture fraction approach (non-premixed model) is already the most cost I can afford. So please relate it, if possible, to the cost of the other models (for a certain number of species for coal combustion)
  Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulent Heat Transfer Transport Equation Flo.duck Main CFD Forum 0 May 6, 2009 03:37
Reducing residuals with PDF combustion model Don FLUENT 0 January 7, 2008 09:06
Turbulent Scalar Transport Dave FLUENT 0 November 12, 2007 11:31
PDF Transport Model HELP Don FLUENT 3 August 22, 2007 15:27
premixed turbulent combustion ywh FLUENT 0 June 18, 2002 04:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50.