|
[Sponsors] |
March 15, 2005, 07:05 |
EDC, PDF transport and turbulent combustion
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi. I have used the non-premixed combustion model to simulate coal combustion in PF burner. The assumption of the chemical equillibrium was acceptable for my case, but I had other problems due to the 2 mixture fractions restriction (I can give more information on this). Therefore I would like to upgrade the combustion model I use, to EDC or PDF transport, but I am not quite sure, which are their main differences and which model is more suitable for my case (coal combustion).
Could anybody with experience on these models give me some guidelines? PS. The computational cost of the two mixture fraction approach (non-premixed model) is already the most cost I can afford. So please relate it, if possible, to the cost of the other models (for a certain number of species for coal combustion) |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulent Heat Transfer Transport Equation | Flo.duck | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 6, 2009 03:37 |
Reducing residuals with PDF combustion model | Don | FLUENT | 0 | January 7, 2008 09:06 |
Turbulent Scalar Transport | Dave | FLUENT | 0 | November 12, 2007 11:31 |
PDF Transport Model HELP | Don | FLUENT | 3 | August 22, 2007 15:27 |
premixed turbulent combustion | ywh | FLUENT | 0 | June 18, 2002 04:20 |