 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
July 13, 2005, 04:31
|
Location of interface for sliding mesh
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi I am trying to solve the flow in a stirred tank with rushton turbine. I have got good results with MRF but now i want to solve it with Sliding Mesh. Can i use the same inner and ourter zones of MRF for sliding mesh or i have to change the location of the interfaces.
gopal |
|
|
||
|
July 14, 2005, 05:30
|
Re: Location of interface for sliding mesh
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
No, but you have to be sure that the interfaces are surfaces of revolution and defined on practically identical geometries, otherwise you will not get a converged solution. And of course, change "Moving Reference Frame" to "Moving Mesh", but you must know that already.
Best wishes, Razvan |
|
|
|
||
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [ICEM] surface mesh merging problem | everest | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 44 | April 14, 2016 07:41 |
| Spontaneous failure of moving mesh interface | gareth__it_power | ANSYS | 1 | August 26, 2010 08:50 |
| RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 05:05 |
| increasing mesh quality is leading to poor convergence | tippo | CFX | 2 | May 5, 2009 11:55 |
| Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |
Linear Mode
