|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello everyone: Recently I have done a research about the simulation of an airfoil in high angles of attack. Surprisingly, I figured out when I use a first order discretization scheme instead of a second order one for all the equations (flow equiations and turbulence kinetic energy and dissipation) I get much better results. It might be interesting to know that for example for an angle of attack of 60 degrees the predicted drag is about 5% off which is really great. I tried different angles as well to make sure that this does not happen accidently and all the results I've got for high angles are great. The results for low angles are very inaccurate though.
I was wondering if somebody has any idea about these phenomena? Thanks Yasser Nabavi |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Domain format problem on airfoil flow simulation | andrenonaka | CFX | 14 | December 7, 2015 00:42 |
Fluent-wrong cl value at high angle of attack | Lucas | FLUENT | 8 | December 1, 2010 06:18 |
Flapping Airfoil Simulation in Low Reynolds Number Flow | M.Sc_Student | FLUENT | 4 | April 7, 2010 10:28 |
convegence problem with high angle of attack | littlelz | CFX | 2 | October 28, 2009 06:07 |
Airfoil Simulation for Validation Purposes | Angela Bong | Main CFD Forum | 7 | September 13, 2006 13:04 |