|
[Sponsors] | |||||
unstructured mesh grid independence for Fluent |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have been using Gambit to develop grids of varying coarseness for studies that I am conducting on the wing of an aircraft. I have created the meshes using an unstructured Tet and just specifying the growth rate of the cells off of the surface. I had a professor the other day raise a concern that he thought Fluent had never proved grid independence on their unstructured 3-D meshes. And I had to admit that when I changed my grid to make it finer, there was very little change in the values along the surface of the wing that I was monitoring. I was wondering if anyone else had encountered this problem or had any information about the grid independence of Fluent's unstructured meshes. Thanks
Shane |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
| fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 12:55 |
| Grid Quality and the Solution | Faraz | Main CFD Forum | 4 | January 10, 2000 19:18 |
| unstructured vs. structured grids | Frank Muldoon | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 5, 1999 11:09 |
| Mesh Compatibility | Andrew Epp | Main CFD Forum | 5 | December 10, 1998 01:50 |