|
[Sponsors] |
June 15, 2007, 11:39 |
triangular mesh vs. quadrilateral mesh
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi!
first of all, i am very sorry for my poor english. i receive review comment of my journal paper from reviewer. a reviewer ask me as this. "Is there a particular reason why the quadrilateral mesh was chosen for the Fluent simulations? Further explanation may be helpful to readers who are not familiar with Fluent." Frankly, i have not particular reson of quadrilateral mesh, but i can't write this. So, I want know advantage of quadrilateral mesh against triangular mesh. thank you very much. ^^; |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Non-physcial solution in the case of triangular mesh from interFoam | ata | OpenFOAM | 28 | September 4, 2016 11:59 |
[ICEM] surface mesh merging problem | everest | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 44 | April 14, 2016 06:41 |
Triangular mesh - fully developed flow between parallel plate | Amir_Ghasemi | Main CFD Forum | 3 | November 28, 2010 04:52 |
Convergence moving mesh | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | November 19, 2007 14:09 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 18:10 |