|
[Sponsors] |
January 31, 2011, 13:40 |
|
#81 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
huh? bro, why? sorry a stupid question
|
|
February 1, 2011, 00:54 |
|
#82 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
because you don't need those volumes.
They are isolated volumes without any fluid-connection to your computationnal domain.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 4, 2011, 10:11 |
|
#83 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
oh sorry heading for my CNY holiday, get to work. now i know, i deleted it, can i start meshing?
|
|
February 8, 2011, 06:31 |
|
#84 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
? are u there bro?
|
|
February 8, 2011, 07:32 |
|
#85 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 9, 2011, 08:07 |
|
#86 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
ok, i meshed it.. Unfortunately, it caused me around 30 minutes, and this time, all the result i save for u to analyse. i get some of the meaning, but some not. Guide me thanks
|
|
February 9, 2011, 08:18 |
|
#87 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
Examine face face.3086, you will see that skewed cells are linked with topology "issue" like sharge angle etc...
Use merge tools for fixing this problem. Then same thing with face face.2557, etc.... But as I already told you, I would FIRST try to mesh your domain without all your fans, which will give your lots of "clean-up" work
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 9, 2011, 08:36 |
|
#88 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
||
February 9, 2011, 08:40 |
|
#89 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
when you started with import: delete fan's volumes before substracting
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 9, 2011, 08:44 |
|
#90 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
hmm, ok forget about deleting the fan volume first, i will try with examine face, for examine face, what shud i do? where is the examine face button?
|
|
February 9, 2011, 08:51 |
|
#91 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
direct above your windows clock
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 9, 2011, 08:56 |
|
#92 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
That is examine mesh, fine. now i press it. Where to edit so that i can examine face 3086? This is the place where only i can see the quality of the mesh.
|
|
February 9, 2011, 09:15 |
|
#93 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
go to range
select all kind of elements (hexa/pyramid/wedge/tetra) set lower limit to 0.9 set upper limit to 1 and display... all the displayed element should be fixed (especially elements between 0.95 and 1) Then check where are the cells, they should be focused at one topology "issue" like sharp edge etc... Then exit to the examine panel, et display the surfaces where Gambit failed to mes the surfaces. You should recongnize the topology "issues"...
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 9, 2011, 09:21 |
|
#94 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
i presume i done it correctly? but why when i press update, it will reset back lower and upper limit 0 and 1 with no element in there? NOTE THAT i already change the lower and upper limit as u say
|
|
February 9, 2011, 09:40 |
|
#95 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
your volume mesh failed, that's why you cannot see any volume elements (because you don't have any)
do the same but with 2d elements
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 9, 2011, 09:52 |
|
#96 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
wow, can i did this while i off mesh in display attribute? cause it is annoying freaking long just to see it. and i cant rotate the screen(left click turn) as all hang started again
|
|
February 9, 2011, 10:00 |
|
#97 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
with 2 elements, it shouldn't be slow.
With 10miilions volume elements, then yes, you can pray that your session won't crash.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 9, 2011, 10:10 |
|
#98 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
ya, finnaly at the end, i am NOT able to see it. i will consider removing the fan volume again then if that is the only idea
|
|
February 23, 2011, 09:43 |
|
#99 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
hey, i am back, remeber last time i say i want to remove the fan, i did it. and here is the summary.
I import the STP file and delete the fan partition. Then unite whole volume, subtract it to get fluid domain. Then i mesh using "Mesh Volume" with spacing of 1. Fortunately, 1 equisized skew issue only comes out. But, mesh fail and the transcript state that due to face 43, asking me to mesh face 43 using the "Mesh face" function(i guess i correctly digested the meaning?) Then i do face meshing at face 43, here is the result i am running out of idea now. What should i do? |
|
February 24, 2011, 03:30 |
|
#100 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
you are trying to mesh your face (complex one) with quad.
Forget trying to mesh your volume with hexa. Switch with tetra (tri for surface mesh)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[GAMBIT] 3D boundary layer and meshing problem in GAMBIT 2.4.6 | prashanthreddyh | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | December 20, 2011 00:35 |
Boundary layer meshing problem in Gambit | Crystal | FLUENT | 0 | June 12, 2009 20:58 |
GAMBIT problem with 3D Boundary Layer when meshing | Anthony Haroutunian | FLUENT | 2 | March 26, 2008 02:02 |
Help Urgent about changing boundary condition | Anjum Naveed | FLUENT | 7 | August 14, 2006 12:25 |
Boundary Layer Meshing of a nosecone | Chris | FLUENT | 1 | March 15, 2005 12:42 |