CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

HAWT, should we use sliding meshes? or the UDF?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By tcarrigan

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   January 2, 2011, 22:30
Arrow HAWT, should we use sliding meshes? or the UDF?
  #1
Member
 
J.-H. Wang
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 15
f0208secretx is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I'm wondering the actual physical mechanism of a wind turbine, HAWT literally. From a basic physics sense, we already knew that the fluid should do work on the turbine to generate the power. That is, despite the start condition of the turbine, if we consider the steady and stable output of the turbine, it should be fluids who accelerates the blades. The resulting torque is balanced with the friction and the resistance of the generator and therefore provides power. However, both the MRF or sliding mesh method are ACTIVE method from my point of view. In specific, they let the blades rotate actively and then the fluid will got disturbed, generating the colorful flow field you've seen on the screen. In other words, this is actually the blades doing work on the fluids, a compressor it is.

Is it the right way to do it?

I have seen a bunch of master thesis and even the official Fluent News (2001 or 2002 Spring) with the analysis on wind turbines utilize these methods. Is there any one who can explain why they did this? How can it be even possible for draining a sensible results? (it actually did...... But I am not comfortable with this weired mechanism..)

Or should I did it another way, applying the UDF and write the governing equation for the rotating motion and let the pressure distribution drives the blade? It is obviously a much more complexmethod, but with a rather sensible physics.

I think I got something wrong in there. Please help me with the confusion. Thank you.

Last edited by f0208secretx; January 2, 2011 at 23:52.
f0208secretx is offline   Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sliding meshes Tim Daly FLUENT 3 November 20, 2008 08:20
Boundaries swapt with sliding meshes guido_adriaensen OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 January 31, 2006 02:55
sliding meshes with periodic BC's Dan Brozozowski FLUENT 3 June 27, 2003 07:10
Grid angle in sliding meshes mystic_cfd FLUENT 0 October 1, 2002 06:07
Empty surface in sliding meshes. Pierre Ricco FLUENT 2 March 14, 2001 16:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44.