|
[Sponsors] |
2990wx falls far behind the dual way E5-2696V4 system in CFD simulations |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 21, 2018, 21:31 |
2990wx falls far behind the dual way E5-2696V4 system in CFD simulations
|
#1 |
New Member
Guangyu Zhu
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 13 |
The AMD platform is:
CPU: 2990WX (32 cores (64 threads)) RAM: 64GB of DDR4-2400 (16GB*4) SSD: INTEL 960P 512GB (NVME) GPU: GTX 1080Ti The Intel platform is: CPU: E5-2696V4*2 (22 cores (44 threads) per CPU) RAM: 128GB of DDR4-2400 RECC (16GB*8) SSB: SAMSUNG 860evo (SATA) GPU: GTX 1060Ti OS are Windows 10 Pro in both platforms. The 2990wx has 4 dies in the CPU, 2 of them (die 0, die 2 ) connect to the RAMs directly, and the other 2 dies access to the RAMs through die 0 and die 2 respectively. The review from pcworld indicated that the per-core bandwidth of 2990wx is only 2GB/s when all cores were used, an obvious delay of memory access would be expected in this situation. The core to core bandwidth of using 2 dies (16 cores) is 5GB/s, In my case, I utilized 16 cores (32 threads) to solve CFD cases (in SimVascular) of 3M and 5M elements on both platforms (32 threads), the Intel one is almost 3 times faster than the AMD platform. I tried to perform the simulations in UBUNTU 18.04 on AMD platform, still falls far behind the Intal one. What will help to improve the performance of the 2990wx platform? Will there be a boost improved performance if I use high-frequency RAM (DDR4-2666 OR 3600)? Or I should insert all the 8 DIMMs with ram? Suggestions are appreciated! ----------------- link to PCWORLD's review https://www.pcworld.com/article/3298...rformance.html |
|
Tags |
2990wx, amd, cfd |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD simulation of hydrogen purification in pressure swing adsorption system | ANDE | FLUENT | 2 | July 4, 2018 03:24 |
CFD Online Celebrates 20 Years Online | jola | Site News & Announcements | 22 | January 31, 2015 00:30 |
Cool (yet useless) CFD simulations? | ximik | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 31, 2014 05:11 |
CFX11 + Fortran compiler ? | Mohan | CFX | 20 | March 30, 2011 18:56 |
public CFD Code development | Heinz Wilkening | Main CFD Forum | 38 | March 5, 1999 11:44 |