CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Hardware

3950x vs x299 build for ansys forte

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 14, 2019, 10:25
Default 3950x vs x299 build for ansys forte
  #1
New Member
 
rahul
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 10
iamrahul is on a distinguished road
hello everyone


I would be deeply grateful if you can lend your expertise on my dilemma :


OBJECTIVE


Ansys Forte for diesel sector mesh- 50K mesh cells maximum on adaptive mesh settings. Chemistry-200 species.


Which should i aim:


A 3950X build or the x299 platform. What memory size and speed should be considered and which GPU to have mainly for post processing. We will not be doing any gaming.


Also will it be prudent to invest a in a clevo barebone with i7- 9700 with 32 gb 2666 Mhz RTX 2060 for such small mesh sizes? (though chemistry time scales could be a major factor)


I know that dual channel ram might be a constraining factor for the 3950x and 9700 cpus, but considering the low mesh sizes would it matter significantly?


Any other issues -please feel free to comment and suggest


Regards
iamrahul is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 15, 2019, 15:41
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
Disclaimer: I never used Ansys forte, and never saw any benchmark for it.
So how many threads does your license allow you to run?

Quote:
I know that dual channel ram might be a constraining factor for the 3950x and 9700 cpus, but considering the low mesh sizes would it matter significantly?
If the model does not fit into last level cache, memory matters. While 50k cells might seem small, I would assume that it still won't fit into L3 with a commercial CFD solver. Especially not when considering the additional memory requirement for the chemistry models.

I highly doubt that a Ryzen 3950X would give you any benefit over a Ryzen 3900X. They have the same topology and same amount of cache. 16 cores would just be starved for memory bandwidth.

I would probably go for a mid-tier X299 CPU with 8-10 cores, and some really fast memory. You could try asking Ansys Support, maybe they surprise you with a helpful answer.

For the GPU: according to this document, Forte does not have any kind of GPU acceleration.
So any cheap graphics card released over the past 5 years should do. Maybe don't go lower than 2GB of GDDR5.

I further assume you will be doing transient simulations with lots of time steps. In case you want to save them frequently for post-processing, an NVMe-SSD seems like a good investment.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 16, 2019, 01:07
Default
  #3
New Member
 
rahul
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 10
iamrahul is on a distinguished road
thank you so much for taking your time out to help. License core max=16
so as i perceive going to a x299 platform would be a prudent choice with minimal investment in GPU (>2 gb ddr5) and nvme.



So if i propose a desktop build of:


i9 9960x
64 gb 3200 ddr4
1050ti
512 gb nvme


will it be ok?
Also as we would need an mobile platform for interim needs ,will the i7 9700 32 gb 512gb nvme be of any help atm till we get to build the desktop?



I thank you again for your kind reply
regards
iamrahul is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 16, 2019, 16:52
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
If you are not buying the PC right away, then get a 10th gen CPU. They will be released by the end of November, and will cost the same as the current gen.
"Fast" RAM for this platform starts at DDR4-3600. You won't need 64GB, but buying 16GB DIMMs is an easy way to have guaranteed dual-rank.

Trying your simulations beforehand on any other PC could help you determine what kind of hardware is actually worth it. For example, you could run a scaling test. See how the speedup is going from 1->2->4->6...cores. Knowing the specs of this machine, we could then make a better prediction which setup is worth your money.

Sure, you can get a laptop with an I7-9700, if you don't have anything to run your simulations right now. Maybe you could use that system to run a few tests.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2019, 00:42
Default
  #5
New Member
 
rahul
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 10
iamrahul is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by flotus1 View Post
If you are not buying the PC right away, then get a 10th gen CPU. They will be released by the end of November, and will cost the same as the current gen.
"Fast" RAM for this platform starts at DDR4-3600. You won't need 64GB, but buying 16GB DIMMs is an easy way to have guaranteed dual-rank.

Trying your simulations beforehand on any other PC could help you determine what kind of hardware is actually worth it. For example, you could run a scaling test. See how the speedup is going from 1->2->4->6...cores. Knowing the specs of this machine, we could then make a better prediction which setup is worth your money.

Sure, you can get a laptop with an I7-9700, if you don't have anything to run your simulations right now. Maybe you could use that system to run a few tests.
Thank you again and especially for the deep insight that you gave me. Thank you.
I will wait for the 10th gen. here in India every PC part is so unjustly expensive. Can i ask you the favour to detail me a rig configuration as you would deem fit for me? You outlined that "You won't need 64GB, but buying 16GB DIMMs is an easy way to have guaranteed dual-rank."- can you please explain especially the " dual rank" thing. Also since the x299 motherboards have 8 dimm slots, do i need to populate all the dimms? Should i target 16*2?
thank you so much for your observations.
iamrahul is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2019, 02:59
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
https://www.crucial.com/usa/en/what-is-a-memory-rank
You don't have to read all of that
One relevant difference is performance. With 1 rank per channel, you get less bandwidth at the same memory frequency. So you would need even faster RAM to make up for the difference.
What you should be aiming for on X299 is 4 DIMMs populated.

I can't really give you a full list of recommended components. Well I could, but it would not make much sense, since we live in different parts of the world. I don't know which parts are available in India, or what they cost.
And more importantly, I would like to encourage you once more to run some scaling tests, before buying an expensive new system. Get back with the results and as much information about CPU and memory configuration of the test system.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2019, 03:05
Default
  #7
New Member
 
rahul
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 10
iamrahul is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by flotus1 View Post
https://www.crucial.com/usa/en/what-is-a-memory-rank
You don't have to read all of that
One relevant difference is performance. With 1 rank per channel, you get less bandwidth at the same memory frequency. So you would need even faster RAM to make up for the difference.
What you should be aiming for on X299 is 4 DIMMs populated.

I can't really give you a full list of recommended components. Well I could, but it would not make much sense, since we live in different parts of the world. I don't know which parts are available in India, or what they cost.
And more importantly, I would like to encourage you once more to run some scaling tests, before buying an expensive new system. Get back with the results and as much information about CPU and memory configuration of the test system.
Thank you so much. I will get back with the tests as soon as we can land the laptop.
regards
iamrahul is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2019, 10:17
Default
  #8
New Member
 
rahul
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 10
iamrahul is on a distinguished road
Sir,


i am attaching an initial forte run summary on i5 laptop for your kind consideration and further advice. This was an initial run some months ago on 3 logical cores hyper-thread enabled and 8gb ram.(dell inspiron)


thank you ever so much
Attached Files
File Type: pdf FOR FLOTUS SIR.pdf (34.4 KB, 14 views)
iamrahul is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SU2 Parallel Build Install Issue jclegg SU2 4 October 20, 2020 04:28
Building from Source on Windows using Cygwin64 ericthefatguy SU2 2 May 12, 2015 18:23
SU2 3.0 build failure waku2005 SU2 Installation 4 January 24, 2014 12:40
Hardware build review/advise for student desktop AerE Hardware 10 July 5, 2013 06:03
64bitrhel5 OF installation instructions mirko OpenFOAM Installation 2 August 12, 2008 18:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:01.