|
[Sponsors] |
October 29, 2023, 00:40 |
CFD workstation with a 4000€ budget
|
#1 |
New Member
Manel
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3 |
Hello! I really appreciate your thread.
I'm here because I have basicly 4k to spend on a computer, and I want to make the best of it! Really appreciate your Greatest advices Which software do you intend to use? Ansys Fluent Are you limited by license constraints? I.e. does your software license only allow you to run on N threads? No licence constraints. What type of simulations do you want to run? And what's the maximum cell count? Related to heat exhangers, I don't know about the maximum cell count but I expect 5-10 million. If there is a budget, how high is it? 4000 euros for All PC + Monitors What kind of setting are you in? Hobbyist? Student? Academic research? Engineer? Academic research + Engineering and designing a product Where can you source your new computer? Buying a complete package from a large OEM? Assemble it yourself from parts? Are used parts an option? Can buy it from parts. Which part of the world are you from? It's cool if you don't want to tell, but since prices and availability vary depending on the region, this can sometimes be relevant. Particularly if it's not North America or Europe. Europe. This is the build I have done: CPU Intel Core i9-13900K 3 GHz 24-Core Processor CPU Cooler be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 50.5 CFM CPU Coole Motherboard MSI MAG B760 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX LGA1700 Motherboard Memory Corsair 2 X Vengeance 64 GB (2 x 32 GB) DDR5-5200 CL40 Memory Storage 2 X Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive Video Card Asus Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 OC Edition GeForce RTX 3060 12GB 12 GB Case Corsair 4000D Airflow ATX Mid Tower Case Power Supply Corsair RM750e (2023) 750 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX As a complete newbie, I have many doubts about the CPU. Thank you so much! |
|
October 29, 2023, 19:47 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Will Kernkamp
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 316
Rep Power: 12 |
Desktop configurations with just two memory channels are not so good for CFD. You should look at a dual EPYC system. Study some of the configurations other people have settled on in "Hardware".
|
|
October 30, 2023, 16:26 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Manel
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3 |
Quote:
I will check it! Edit: After having read many threads, first I understood (along with some research) how beneficial a quad-channel CPU is, the main problem being that I can only buy new parts and I don't have the money necessary for EPYC, so my comparation would be between i7-9800X and i9-13900K, the first is much older but based on what I saw I could enjoy the benefits of parallel running: Processor Model: i7-9800X (Quad-Channel) Number of processor cores: 8 Number of processor threads: 16 Processor Series: Intel® Core™ X-series Processor Cache: 16.5 MB Processor Cache Type: Smart Cache Compatible Chipsets: Intel® X299 Processor Max Turbo Frequency: 4.4 GHz Maximum Internal Memory Supported by the Processor: 128 GB Memory Types Supported by the Processor: DDR4-SDRAM Memory Speeds Supported by the Processor: 2666 MHz Max Memory Bandwidth 85 GB/s VS Processor Model: i9-13900K (Dual-Channel) Processor Family: Intel® Core™ i9 Processor Core Count: 24 Processor Thread Count: 32 Processor Operating Modes: 64-bit High-Performance Cores: 8 Efficient Cores: 16 Processor Max Turbo Frequency: 5.8 GHz High-Performance Core Turbo Frequency: 5.4 GHz High-Performance Core Base Frequency: 3 GHz Efficient Core Turbo Frequency: 4.3 GHz Efficient Core Base Frequency: 2.2 GHz Processor Cache: 36 MB Maximum Internal Memory Supported by the Processor: 128 GB Memory Types Supported by the Processor: DDR4-SDRAM, DDR5-SDRAM Memory Channels: Dual Channel Maximum Memory Bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s What would be your opinion between the two CPUs and there's any suggestion in between ? (i9-13900K ~~ 650 euros, i7-9800X ~~ 350 euros) Thank you so much, and I'm sorry for bothering you, I'm just a bit desperate due to having little time to choose the PC for the research group :') . Last edited by newcomer_123; October 30, 2023 at 19:29. |
||
October 31, 2023, 01:44 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46 |
Hi there, I moved these posts to their own dedicated thread. Feel free to adjust the thread title if mine is too generic.
Now, with the introduction of DDR5, these older quad-channel HEDT platforms like X299 heve been made obsolete IMO. With a modern desktop CPU, you get at least the same all-core performance, with significantly higher single-core performance. So I'd say X299 is not an option. If you want to mix things up from the I9-13900k, I see two options: 1) I7-13700k/I7-14700k: same amount of p-cores as the I9-13900k, at slightly lower frequency and cache size. A good trade-off if you want to save some money. Using faster RAM has a much greater impact on performance. I'd recommend something in the DDR5-6400 CL32 range. Unless you need 128GB of RAM, in which case memory transfer rates would need to be dialed back a litle. 2) For more performance, look at the Xeon-W 2400 series. They offer quad-channel DDR5, and the cores are pretty much the same as the P-cores in a 12th gen desktop chip from Intel. It comes at a cost though: The 12-core Intel Xeon w5-2455X is ~1250€ retail, and motherboards start at 850€. E.g. ASUS Pro WS W790-Ace. It should still fit into the budget if you are only paying for parts. Also has the benefit error correction on the RAM, in case that's important to you. |
|
October 31, 2023, 11:33 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Manel
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3 |
Hello Alex,
To start, THANK YOU SO MUCH, I learned a lot by seing your thread and comments. I'm thankful for all your help and your options, now I understand the topic a lot better. Unfortunately it seems that my country doesn't sell a lot of these better equipment (even for example, Xeon-W 2400 series), so I'll have to go with I9-13900K for 128GB of RAM, probably the best I'm going to get in the market for my price range. Because after this the only products that are sold are really High-End like 5k - 6k processors. Thank you so much for your help, and I'd like to resume what I learned with you: - equipment should all be compatible; - generally as CFD simulations require a lot of parallelization, Quad-channels are superior to Dual-channels as far as CPU goes. - but new technology related to RAM memories can help to mitigate the lack of performance of dual-channel CPU in case it's not possible for the user to buy a quad-channel with the same RAM technology. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD workstation with a limited budget | hami11 | Hardware | 2 | May 17, 2021 23:07 |
Advice for a new CFD workstation for fire modelling, ~£6,000 budget | Chief Cookie | Hardware | 5 | December 26, 2019 06:10 |
Opinion of this self built workstation for CFD modelling | Hajart | Hardware | 28 | December 14, 2016 17:18 |
Please Help...CFD Simulations Workstation | sharath chandra | Hardware | 1 | May 15, 2016 02:18 |
CFD Design...The CFD Future | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 20 | November 19, 2015 23:40 |