CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

The aspect ratio of the volume elements in Finite Volume Method

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 27, 2012, 12:07
Default The aspect ratio of the volume elements in Finite Volume Method
New Member
Charlie Tan
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 8
CharlieTan84 is on a distinguished road
Hello people,

I have a question about the Finite Volume Method. Is the aspect ratio of the volume elements in Finite Volume Method important? The element aspect ratios are important in Finite Element Method, but I don't know if it's the case in FVM.

Thank you very much!
CharlieTan84 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2012, 16:07
Senior Member
Chris DeGroot
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 388
Rep Power: 9
cdegroot is on a distinguished road
Yes you should try to keep the aspect ratio reasonable.

There are some exceptions, for example if you have a 2D grid and you extrude it in the third dimension to make it 3D the aspect ratio can typically be large as long as things aren't changing a lot in that direction.

For general problems, try to avoid very large aspect ratios whenever possible.
cdegroot is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2012, 17:39
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 271
Rep Power: 9
leflix is on a distinguished road
I have seen some authors who claimed that the ratio between two consecutive cells shouldn't be greater than 1.5. But it depends where and what for.
It seems that you limit the diffusion of the solution when the ratio is close to 1. However to manage with safety outflow boundaries,it is advised to extend the domain with expanded cells when you come closer to that boundaries.
For accuracy it seems better to keep as much as possible the ratio close to 1.
leflix is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2012, 02:34
Super Moderator
Oliver Gloth
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Todtnau, Germany
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 10
ogloth is on a distinguished road

it depends on the flow situation, cell type, solver, and the weather ...

For boundary layers (and most solvers), highly anisotropic cells do not pose a problem. On the contrary, you would not be able to fulfil the y+ <= 1 (or even 30-100) requirement without anisotropic cells.

I have also seen crisp shock waves which have been resolved by anisotropic tetras -- something that most people would tell you to avoid. If, however, you try to resolve a free shear layer with anisotropic tetras, you are quite likely to get an "NaN" as a reply ...

As a rule of thumb for most applications I would suggest to use anisotropic cells in the boundary layer only. Try to get the cells aligned as good as possible (i.e. use prisms or hexes).

ogloth is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
gradient calculation of cell centered finite volume method zhengjg Main CFD Forum 10 November 12, 2012 00:13
References for the finite volume method on unstructured grids old newbie Main CFD Forum 1 April 25, 2011 23:53
Control Volume , Finite Volume, Finite Control Volume, Finite Element Method technocrat.prakash Main CFD Forum 1 April 24, 2010 19:24
Comparison: Finite Volume Method vs. Analytic Method m-fry Main CFD Forum 1 April 20, 2010 14:40
Sparse linear systems in finite volume method Lionel S. Main CFD Forum 6 January 19, 2007 11:04

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21.