|
[Sponsors] |
June 2, 2006, 14:59 |
y+ for NACA0012 transonic simulations
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I'm doing bidimensional transonic simulations over the NACA 0012 using a structured O-grid. My Euler results are good, so I start my full Navier-Stokes simulation from the Euler result using the Baldwin & Lomax model. The final result is not bad, but the y+ for j=2 is too high(from 1 to 25), and theoretically there are no grid points on the viscous sublayer(that is, y+ less than 5). I start by decreasing the j=2 distance to 0.000003 (based on airfoil chord of 1), but the y+ values are still very high. -What are the normal grid distances from the wall to j=2 for these type of simulations? -Is there any way to reduced the y+ values without changing the flow properties? (Standard sea level temp and pressure) Thanks for your suggestions! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hardware selection for steady/unsteady incompressible, turbulent and cht simulations | maddalena | OpenFOAM | 2 | July 13, 2011 08:55 |
AVL Fire transonic simulation | Ainil | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 24, 2010 15:53 |
Timestepping in two - phase Simulations using RSM | challenger85 | CFX | 0 | January 4, 2010 05:00 |
Transonic Dip & Phase lag | technophobe | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 24, 2009 15:52 |
URANS and Transient Simulations | bob | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 1, 2003 03:54 |