CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

Timestepping in two - phase Simulations using RSM

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 4, 2010, 06:00
Default Timestepping in two - phase Simulations using RSM
New Member
Torsten Thomas Betschart
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 9
challenger85 is on a distinguished road
Hi all

I have a question about the correct set up for the timesteps in a two - phase air - water flow simulation in subchannels of a nuclear reactor.

The following models were used for the simulations:
Two fluid model (air and water, buoyant flow with standard components), monodispersed bubble distribution (here 3mm)

Since the set up contains no heating, the isothermal model was used.

Alle the available Drag and non - Drag forces were activated (in agreement with simulations carried out before, the Grace model for the Drag force, the Tomyiama Lift force model, Frank wall lubrication force model and Favre-averaged Drag force model for turbulent dispersion were activated - furthermore, Satos enhanced eddy viscosity model for the turbulence transfer was activated).
Furthermore, the BSL Reynolds Stress model was used (see below for justification; in fact, the recommendation of changing this model is not the key for success).

For the outlet, an opening condition was used, setting a static pressure condition of 1 atm (and consistend values for the other parameters).

The figure attached shows one plane of the smulated geometry and the results obtained for single - phase flow (which does not matter, because the mean tendencies in the velocity fields, which are shown in single phase, can also be seen in two - phase flow).

The vector plot shows the structure of the arising secondary motions. These motions, which can also be seen in two phase simulations, are only calculated correctly if a RSM model is used (and you can believe me, it has to be like that: approaches using two equation tubulent models fail).

The three png graphic files show typical convergence behavior for the carried simulations carried out. It can be seen, that the values for the volume fraction are quite bad, where the other parameters seem to behave quite well.

My basic question is about timestepping: it has shown during the simulation work, that the set - up of the time step has a sever influence of the quality to the results - but i was not able to figure out, which rules should be taken as reference (and the documentation did not help me out...). My general question: is there a rule, which timescales has to be resolved by setting up the timestep? Or is there a general remark which you could make?

Best regards
Torsten Betschart
Attached Images
File Type: gif 406_h.GIF (19.6 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg TurbSolv.jpg (33.4 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg VolFracSolv.jpg (25.3 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg MomMassSolv.jpg (34.7 KB, 8 views)

Last edited by challenger85; January 4, 2010 at 07:31.
challenger85 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to access only one phase in multiphase model by UDF wersoe Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 1 January 4, 2017 08:11
Source Term used in Eulerian Model(Two phase) Padian FLUENT 1 May 19, 2008 03:47
Discrete Phase Simulations CFDtoy FLUENT 2 April 26, 2005 01:17
compressible two phase flow in CFX4.4 youngan CFX 0 July 1, 2003 23:32
Unsteady Simulations of Phase Change Mike FLUENT 0 September 26, 2002 05:30

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42.