|May 2, 2013, 06:07||
Backward facing ramp - SST k-omega model y+ requirements
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 150Rep Power: 6
Hello CFD fellow Warriors,
I would like to ask a few fundamental questions today regarding the choice of appropriate mesh refinement strategies and required non-dimensional wall scale y+, for the SST .
Firstly, the entire domain is representing an external flow over a hump at 4.5 m/s and the length is ~3.5 m. The incline ramp is 5.5 degrees and the decline ramp is 16 degrees. The Reynolds Number is 5.5x10^5.
I am currently having a dilemma with some of the options in the Fluent control panel for the SST model and I have tried to understand the curvature correction and the low-Re correction switched on for all simulations. The main questions are listed below -
1. Based on my limited knowledge the low-Re model tries to account for regions of the flow field where the Reynolds numbers are not turbulent and are experiencing transitions or laminar behaviour. It tends to dampen the turbulence viscosity. Does this negatively impact my boundary layer studies?
2. I am currently using a y+ < 1 for most of the ramp (Image) and I think this should be OK with the Low-Re correction model. Is there an actual lower limit for the y+ that is recommended for the SST model? I thought that near-wall resolution is good if I am not considering using the wall function approach.
Please share your thoughts, experiences and comments with turbulence modelling and boundary layer growth.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Number of transport equations in k-w SST model||marcolovatto||Main CFD Forum||1||December 13, 2011 21:37|
|CFX-11 vs CFX-13 SST Model||Zigainer||CFX||10||December 2, 2011 05:40|
|SST K- omega turbulence model||mb.pejvak||Main CFD Forum||8||September 16, 2011 08:52|
|Use of k omega turbulence model||john_w||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||2||September 22, 2009 05:15|
|Understanding k-omega SST model source code||tmhonka||OpenFOAM Programming & Development||1||September 8, 2009 07:33|