
[Sponsors] 
Isothermal fluid flow and the Energy Equation 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Search this Thread  Display Modes 
September 17, 2013, 16:18 
Isothermal fluid flow and the Energy Equation

#1 
New Member
Kay
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 
Hi all, I'm taking an introductory CFD course, and was hoping for a better explanation than my professor gave for a question I had during class:
When fluid flow is treated as incompressible and isothermal, the energy equation does not need to be solved. I get that this is the case, but what is the reason behind this/why is this the case? (constant temp = constant internal energy? or am I missing a few steps?) On a related note, what are the major assumptions that we make in this case to reduce the complete set of NS equations to the NS equations for the case for incompressible, isothermal flow? (constant density, anything else?) 

September 17, 2013, 16:40 

#2  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,551
Rep Power: 58 
Quote:
Div V =0 DV/Dt + Grad p = ni* Lap V that is a set of two equations in two unknowns. The problem is well posed by simply specifying initial and bc.s conditions, you can see that pressure is not a thermodinamic function. The temperature field (i.e., the energy equation) is totally decoupled from the dynamic of the flow. That can be found in any book of fluid mechanics 

September 17, 2013, 16:41 

#3 
New Member
Kay
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 
The 4 CFD books I looked into just said that it was the case to not solve the energy equation under isothermal conditions, not WHY it was the case. Thanks for your help!


September 17, 2013, 18:05 

#4 
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 
if you consider the NS equations in the differential form for isothermal and incompressible conditions the derivatives of all temperature and densities equal zero. doing that you can easily derive it yourself.


September 17, 2013, 18:45 

#5  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,551
Rep Power: 58 
Quote:
Maybe, some difference in definitions can confuse me... I assume the suffix "iso" as the same as used for isoentropic flows. That means that a quantity is constant along trajectory. Thus, for isothermal flows, I assume something like dT/dt+u*dT/dx=0, not necessarily to have all the derivatives zero. I would say the latter case as omothermal... 

September 18, 2013, 05:28 

#6  
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 134
Rep Power: 12 
Quote:
1) In a compressible flow, the local density of the fluid depends both on pressure and temperature. The mass, momentum and energy conservation equations are coupled (density appears in all of them!) and therefore they must be solved simultaneously. Pressure is usually calculated from temperature and density using an appropriate equation of state (ideal gas for instance). 2) If you assume incompressible flow (think of a liquid, or even a gas but flowing at a low Mach number) density is constant. The velocity field does not depend anymore on the temperature distribution (since temperature variations do not induce density changes, and also neglecting fluid viscosity dependence on temperature). Therefore, the momentum equation can be solved separately, where pressure is such that it ensures continuity (mass conservation, ). The energy (temperature) equation can be solved for a posteriori using the solved velocity field to obtain the temperature distribution, even though if your fluid is also assumed to be isothermal then there's no need (T=Tfluid everywhere). Cheers, Michujo. Last edited by michujo; September 18, 2013 at 06:34. 

September 18, 2013, 07:27 

#7  
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 
Quote:


Tags 
basic assumptions, incompressible flow, intro cfd, isothermal flow, ns equations 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  

