
[Sponsors] 
November 30, 2013, 00:48 
Minimum Time Step with Navier Stokes

#1 
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5 
Hello,
I am a bit of a newbie at CFD. I am trying to determine what the minimum time step would be when solving the NS equations for a liddriven cavity flow (2D) in order to achieve stability. The flow is incompressible, viscous, and the results I am interested in are at steady state. I am using a finite difference method with a colocated grid. I'm really not sure how to even approach this problem and any advice on what I need to do to find the time step would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much for any and all replies. 

November 30, 2013, 05:27 

#2  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,354
Rep Power: 37 
Quote:
I don't see your type of discretization, Re number and number of cells. I can suggest a rude approximation for evaluating a practical dt in case of Re sufficiently high: dt_p*(umax/dx+vmax/dy)<1 > dt = alpha*dt_p (alpha = 0.1  0.5) 

November 30, 2013, 11:18 

#3  
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5 
Quote:
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by dt_p? And the value of alpha is dependent on Re? 

November 30, 2013, 11:26 

#4 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,354
Rep Power: 37 
what about the timeintegration scheme?


November 30, 2013, 11:40 

#5 
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5 
I am using an Explicit Time Advance scheme.
I calculate the combination of the advective and viscous terms and its divergence from the initial velocity field. I solve Poisson's equation for pressure and then compute the velocity field at the next time step. I hope that answers your question. 

November 30, 2013, 12:42 

#6  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,354
Rep Power: 37 
Quote:
dt_d*(1/dx^2 + 1/dy^2)/Re <1/2. As your sistem is non linear such value should be furhter reduced 

November 30, 2013, 12:52 

#7 
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5 
Well perhaps I have other errors in my code but this produces a far larger time step than I have been using and it is immediately unstable. From where did you derive this equation for stability?
If I have a square that I have divided into a grid of 100 points with delta x = delta y = 0.1 that gives me a time step of 1 second per your equation? 

November 30, 2013, 13:23 

#8  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,354
Rep Power: 37 
Quote:
The constraint comes from the linear stabilty analysis of the parabolic equation dphi/dt=Gamma* Lap Phi, discretized with the FTCS scheme Assuming a grid formed by 10x10 cells (dx=dy=0.1) you simply have dt_d < 0.25. Therefore dt =0.1 should work. If you see instability after few timesteps then there is an error in the code 

November 30, 2013, 13:27 

#9  
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5 
Quote:


Tags 
finite difference method, navierstokes, stability 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
High Courant Number @ icoFoam  Artex85  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  11  February 16, 2017 14:40 
Rapidly decreasing deltaT for interDyMFoam  chrisb2244  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  3  July 1, 2014 16:40 
Sudden jump in Courant number  NJG  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  7  May 15, 2014 13:52 
Full pipe 3D using icoFoam  cyberbrain  OpenFOAM  4  March 16, 2011 10:20 
Could anybody help me see this error and give help  liugx212  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  3  January 4, 2006 19:07 