|
[Sponsors] |
PowerFlow (LBE) vs. Traditional (Navier Stokes)? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 16, 2013, 11:43 |
Aerodynamic simulation software help - Powerflow vs Others?
|
#1 |
New Member
Aerodynamic Researcher
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello everyone,
Just wanted to ask people with background in aero cfd if they had used (and their experience with) Powerflow from company Exa. They claim to have 14 of the top 15 car manufacturers in the world as their customers, but I know that Audi switched from Powerflow to Openfoam. 1. Is Powerflow better than traditional aero-simulation software aka Star-CD, Fluent or Cfx? 2. Is LBE better / more accurate than Navier Stokes for aero-simulation? 3. If you are one of Powerflow's commercial users (for example in one of these car companies) - what software did you use before Powerflow? Are you also using their aero-acoustic/thermal features? What do you think of them? Also, how critical is Powerflow to your design process? Can you survive using what you used earlier? Can you use Openfoam like Audi - if so why dont you use that? Thanks very much! Regards, Wannabe Aerodynamic Expert Last edited by CFD Newbie; May 16, 2013 at 14:13. Reason: Hope to make thread's subject more clear |
|
Tags |
aeroacoustics, aerodynamics, exa, lbe, powerflow |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adding a term to Navier Stokes Equation | ashtonJ | CFX | 3 | January 15, 2011 06:32 |
ILU for Navier stokes problems | Raju | Main CFD Forum | 5 | July 29, 2006 14:15 |
Navier stokes compresible viscid flow fea, somebody can help? | Jose Choy | Main CFD Forum | 3 | October 24, 2003 02:28 |
Newbie:Viscoelasticity and Navier stokes equation | Rajil Saraswat | Main CFD Forum | 2 | June 9, 2003 07:21 |
help: I am trying to solve Navier Stokes compressible and viscid flow | Jose Choy | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 18, 2000 05:45 |