CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

extrapolation in MUSCL scheme

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Fuka

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   February 14, 2007, 04:10
Default extrapolation in MUSCL scheme
  #1
Chandra
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hello,

I am planning to shift to MUSCL scheme in my Energy Equation solver(calculation of T) from upwind scheme (which I am using so far). I went through details and understood almost all the things except one, which is as follows:

To solve, say, "du/dt + df(u)/dx = 0", using MUSCL scheme, one needs to evaluate f[u*_(i+1/2)] and f[u*_(i-1/2)]. Literature says that u*_(i+1/2) = g[u_(1+1/2)_L, u_(1+1/2)_R] and u*_(i-1/2) = g[u_(1-1/2)_L, u_(1-1/2)_R].

For these functions "g()", the reference I got on wikipedia is to use Kurganov and Tadmor central scheme [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUSCL_scheme]. But that requires evaluation of spectral radius of "df/du" at different node-points to calculate the local propagation speed. This evaluation of spectral radius seems to be much time consuming.

Could any of you please suggest me any of the following:

1. How to evaluate the local-propagation speed "easily"?

2. Is there any other way to get a reliable function "g()" (instead of Kurganov and Tadmor's scheme).

and at last,

3. If I am wrong somewhere, please suggest me if there is any other way to implement the MUSCL scheme easily. Or, a way to have better solution than the upwind scheme I am using now (I thought of using 3rd order upwind scheme but I rejected the idea because it will get too complex on staggered, non-uniform grids).

Thank you very much in anticipation,

Please help me if you have any experience with using MUSCL,

regards, Chandra
  Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trouble when using MUSCL scheme on ONERA M6 wing Aurélien FLUENT 2 January 23, 2013 07:42
Numerical viscosity due to the MUSCL and HLL coulpled scheme sonsiest Main CFD Forum 0 May 23, 2011 15:37
MUSCL scheme implementation ANPDEstudent Main CFD Forum 1 June 26, 2010 23:57
Extrapolation scheme in icoFoam skabilan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 June 21, 2010 16:37
MUSCL scheme B. Nilsson Main CFD Forum 1 October 30, 1998 02:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:58.