# diverge with low Re numbers

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 April 9, 2007, 05:43 diverge with low Re numbers #1 hui Guest   Posts: n/a Hello i am using RSM to calculate turbulent Couette Flow. My program works well with high Re numbers but diverged with low Re numbers. Anyone has such experences? how can the Re number influent the performance of the program?

 April 10, 2007, 04:36 Re: diverge with low Re numbers #2 Phil Guest   Posts: n/a don't have experience of exactly this but sounds like possibly the actual physics become unsteady at low Re and so you need to use the explicit solver. Run an unsteady simulation and compare the velocity contours at different time steps. You might see a wake that is changing position with time! Otherwise, if you want a steady solution try bringing in relaxation factors towards the end of the solution AFTER the solution starts to become unstable but only bring down the relaxation factors a little for THE UNSTABLE EQUATIONS because it will take much longer to converge. Please note- IF YOUR SOLUTION IS STILL CONVERGING AND ISN'T TOO UNSTABLE THEN IT MAY BE WORTH JUST LETTING IT CONVERGE ANYWAY. If this worries you then try it with and without the RF's. You may get the same result but in half the iterations by just leaving it! but depends whether the solution is still converging or not! hope this helps.

 April 10, 2007, 07:16 Re: diverge with low Re numbers #3 hui Guest   Posts: n/a Thank you very much!! I will try again

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post PB4 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 April 1, 2011 08:42 amar FLUENT 1 July 23, 2009 11:51 liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 18:07 Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12 Peter Main CFD Forum 7 May 15, 2003 07:12

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top