
[Sponsors] 
March 20, 2015, 10:32 

#41 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
Hey, that's nice how Jonas didn't acknowledge my contributions. I guess they were not insightful.


March 20, 2015, 10:45 

#42 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
The velocity term in the compressible Navier Stokes equations are nondimensionalized by the speed of sound. There is a difference between Mach number approaching zero and the Mach number actually being zero. The flow for the Mach number actually being zero is boring.


March 20, 2015, 11:03 

#43 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
Oh, and if one views my 1D bar of accelerating steal as a fluid I gather the reason I have a dp/dx is that there is a dp/dt at the boundary. Like I said, Dp/Dt = V*dp/dx + dp/dt = 0.


March 20, 2015, 11:23 

#44 
Senior Member
Jonas T. Holdeman, Jr.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 16 
Thank you too, Martin.


March 20, 2015, 11:41 

#45 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
OK, so does your original statement/theory agree or disagree with the fact that a 1D accelerating incompressible bar of steal has a dp/dx? And a 1D bar of steal can be modeled by the incompressible 1D Euler equations. If you can not show that, then your mathematical analysis has a hole in it.


March 20, 2015, 13:22 

#46 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,252
Rep Power: 67 
well, however 1D case implies du/dx = 0 from the divergencefree constraint?
Otherwise we are speaking of the classical Burgers equation (zero pressure gradient) which model compressibility effects? I am not understanding 

March 20, 2015, 13:33 

#47 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
V of steal coming into control volume equals V of steal coming out of control volume, so yes, du/dx is zero. So yes.
However, if the bar of steal is accelerating, i.e. dV/dt, then the Euler equation gives a dp/dx. I showed that above. 

March 20, 2015, 14:03 

#48 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,252
Rep Power: 67 
but I don't think that the equation du/dt + dp/dx = 0 can be considered as counterpart of Euler incompressible equation for a fluid


March 21, 2015, 00:24 

#49 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
The incompressible Euler's momentum equation states dp/dx = rho*DV/dt. It is just F=ma. It is not a counterpart. Or maybe I don't understand what you mean by a counterpart. If DV/dt is not zero, i.e. acceleration or deacceleration, then there must be a dp/dx. Or, if the pressure field is constant everywhere then acceleration is zero. For anything interesting to occur there must be a pressure gradient for the incompressible Euler equations. Sorry, I know the sentences above are basically repeating themselves.
Yet, it seems as if people are saying that the pressure gradient is zero. That can only be true if there is no acceleration. So I'm really confused about what people are writing. At this point, I sure don't think any evidence has been provided that the Euler equations need to be adjusted. 

March 21, 2015, 00:31 

#50 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
The incompressible Euler equations are shown here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_e...id_dynamics%29 I'm surprised I feel I need to make reference to this. Which makes me wonder if I really understand what is being said in this discussion thread. 

March 21, 2015, 04:18 

#51 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,252
Rep Power: 67 
if your example is well understood, you are considering the 1D case with du/dx=0, therefore the pressure gradient balance only the Eulerian acceleration being the convective term udu/dx zero.
That is not a general Euler equation where the non linear part is fundamental in the fluid dynamics and the pressure gradient contributes to balance also that 

March 21, 2015, 04:24 

#52  
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 529
Rep Power: 14 
Quote:
So, If you go back and consider a trivial case of 1d flow in a frictionless pipe then, if you prescribe a velocity inlet (dirichlet) the continuity equation prevents a continuous acceleration which means that you can't have a pressure gradient. This example would represent your steel bar at free flight in vacuum I guess (after the solution of the Poisson equation). Basically: if you prescribe the pressure gradient then you have a pressure gradient and if you set the inlet velocity then you have no pressure gradient. (in your 1d frictionless case) 

March 21, 2015, 10:38 

#53 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
"Basically: if you prescribe the pressure gradient then you have a pressure gradient and if you set the inlet velocity then you have no pressure gradient. (in your 1d frictionless case"
I'm referring to nonsteady case flow, i.e. dV/dt is not zero. dV/dt is set at the boundary and since dV/dx is zero throughout the fluid by incompressibility then dV/dt is constant throughout the fluid. And since dV/dt is constant throughout the fluid then so is dp/dx. 

March 21, 2015, 11:50 

#54 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
Filippo:
I gather your point is that my example is too simple. And yes, I too feel that it is simple. OK, I should include u*du/dx Du/dt = u*du/dx + du/dt and, in 2D, by conservation of mass du/dx = dv/dy. So Du/dt = u*dv/dy + du/dt. The u*dv/dy term is centripetal acceleration. Therefore the Euler momentum equation says dp/dx is a function of centripetal acceleration and linear acceleration. Centripetal acceleration brings up the subject of vorticity and the incompressible vorticity transport equation says vorticity comes from the boundary too. Acceleration, in one form or another, for an an incompressible fluid must come from the boundary. And without acceleration dp/dx is zero. 

March 21, 2015, 11:53 

#55 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
By the way this (irrotationality and incompressibility) brings us back to potential flow, which Jonas blew off earlier.


March 21, 2015, 12:13 

#56  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,252
Rep Power: 67 
Quote:
no...because if you use a 2d example then Du/dt = du/dt + udu/dx+vdu/dy Dv/dt = dv/dt + udv/dx+vdv/dy and you have to take into account also dp/dy in the Euler system 

March 21, 2015, 12:26 

#57 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
It's an acceleration due to the change in the direction of the flow.
Are people saying that an incompressible flow can not change direction? 

March 21, 2015, 12:27 

#58 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,252
Rep Power: 67 
1D Euler + divergencefree contraint (du/dx=0) drive to:
d rho/dt + u(t) d rho/dx = 0 du/dt + (1/rho) dp/dx = 0 dp/dt + u(t) dp/dx = 0 therefore, rho and p can vary in time and space but they must be constant along the pathline dx/dt = u(t). If you add the constraint that the fluid is really incompressible, then rho is constant both in time and in space as well as the pressure 

March 21, 2015, 12:40 

#59 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
So, you are saying that Euler equations do not boil down to the Bernoulli equation. I believe they do. But, unfortunately, I just don't have the time to prove it or dig up a reference. I'll have to leave it at this.
And we both agree that the velocity profile can be found using potential theory, correct? 

March 21, 2015, 12:48 

#60 
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 17 
In regards to this:
dp/dt + u(t) dp/dx = 0 dp/dt comes from the boundary. As I mentioned before. 

Tags 
actionatadistance, body force, incompressible fluid, physics 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
how to set periodic boundary conditions  Ganesh  FLUENT  15  November 18, 2020 07:09 
Difficulty in calculating angular velocity of Savonius turbine simulation  alfaruk  CFX  14  March 17, 2017 07:08 
derivation for special case for incompressible fluid; condition for v?  Simonee  Main CFD Forum  0  March 18, 2014 07:56 
How to apply negtive pressure to outlet  bioman66  CFX  5  June 3, 2006 02:40 
Modeling of free surface in CFD ?  Kim TaeMin  Main CFD Forum  18  July 16, 2001 12:38 