CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Spalart Allmaras

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 26, 2008, 07:59
Default Spalart Allmaras
CFD - NewBe
Posts: n/a
Hey buddys,

got a question to turbulence modeling in general.

There are the several ways of dealing with turbulence. Lets talk about RANS. The T-Models try to predict the turbulent shear stress. My question is, do they try to predict the elements of the stress tensor over the whole boundary layer thickness or do they start to be valid after a special wall distance? And does this gap been closed by the logarithmic wall law in general?

I'm specially interested in Spalart Allmaras, because the damping functions, specially for the production term of the viscosity, are nearly zero till y+<=4, which means that there is no production in viscosity or that the logarithmic wall law is valid there instead.

I'm wee bit confused. Can somebody help me out my confusion, please?

  Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2008, 08:13
Default Re: Spalart Allmaras
CFD - NewBe
Posts: n/a
...right now I proved myself wrong. The logarithmic wall law is valid for y+ > 30. But what about the gap between 5<y+<30? Is the SA-Model valid till the wall?...
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2008, 09:07
Default Re: Spalart Allmaras
Praveen. C
Posts: n/a
SA model can be integrated up to the wall. You will need a grid of y+ = O(1).
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2008, 17:08
Default Re: Spalart Allmaras
Paolo Lampitella
Posts: n/a
As stated by Praveen the SA model has Low-Re capability and can be used down to the wall (if the grid is fine enough to let the model works properly)

However there is no attempt to predict the stress tensor elements (this is what happens in 2nd order models like "Reynolds-stress models") because this is a so-called "turbulent viscosity model"

Also the K-epsilon model has a low-Re extension which works properly down to the wall (again with the right conditions) and maybe there are some few other models with this capability.

But, actually, the biggest part of the models doesn't have this feature and there is no reason (if not totally wrong) to have any grid point inside the viscous sub-layer. Usually the first grid point is put inside or at the end of the log-layer and a properly chosen boundary condition is selected (which uses the log-law, so this approach is only valid where this law is valid) to let everything works fine enough (that is to have the right stress at the wall).

Even with the LES approach, some very popular models have the same problems at the wall (e.g. smagorinsky) if not corrected

I hope this is what you were looking for
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2008, 02:15
Default Re: Spalart Allmaras
CFD - NewBe
Posts: n/a
Thanks Paolo for this comprehensive answer.

I understand the difference.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spalart and Allmaras Paper Mohamed Main CFD Forum 7 July 10, 2014 16:39
Spalart Allmaras nan error ghost FLUENT 2 January 29, 2010 09:01
Spalart Allmaras Paper Seroga Main CFD Forum 0 April 7, 2008 02:48
spalart allmaras paper hafiz Main CFD Forum 1 April 10, 2007 03:47
extracting K and Epsilon from Spalart Allmaras Sundar Main CFD Forum 4 July 31, 2006 02:02

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:11.