CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Two-Way coupled DEM with heat transfer - Which is good?:+ LIGGHTS/OpenFOAM/CFDEM/<??>

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 29, 2015, 15:22
Default Two-Way coupled DEM with heat transfer - Which is good?:+ LIGGHTS/OpenFOAM/CFDEM/<??>
  #1
New Member
 
Yesaswi
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 10
yesaswi92 is on a distinguished road
Hello Everybody,

I am currently dealing with the simulation of particles in closed geometries (Cylindrical Pipes). I used the DEM solver in Star-CCM to simulate the flow of particles in vertical pipes. The flow is in dense phase (packing fraction ~ 60%) and is solely driven by gravity. Since the influence of air on the flow is minimal in dense phase flow, I did not use any FVM solvers and just computed the motion of particles using DEM. Thus, there was no coupling between the interstitial air and the particles.

Now, I need to extend this study for heat transfer applications in which, the particles are heated from the pipe wall. In this case, since the interstitial air plays a vital role, I need to adopt a two-way coupled DEM. But the simulation methodology in StarCCM is giving wrong results. Though the simulation was converging for all the time steps, the energy input into the system is less than the energy rise of the system. After a lot of study, I understood that the problem might lie in the DEM methodology employed in StarCCM. In the two-way coupling, when a particle is absorbing/releasing some energy from/to the air, it is considered as a source term. But this source term is only added to the mesh cell which contains the center of the mesh and not to the cells where a portion of the particle still presents. This might be leading to the energy imbalance. Though I can try to solve this by using a mesh size that is greater than particle diameter, I need to compromise on the flow geometry.

Thus, I am currently exploring other options to simulate this case. So I want suggestions as of which OpenSource code is perfect for my case: LIGGGHTS, CFDEM, OpenFoam etc. I have no experience in LIGGGHTS or CFDEM but many people suggested it.

I need to simulate a Two-way coupled DEM flow enabled with particle-particle conduction, particle-wall conduction, air-wall conduction and particle-air convection.

Please suggest which one is the apt for my simulation case.

Thank you very much!!
Yesaswi
yesaswi92 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfdem, dem, heat transfer, lagrangian particles, liggghts

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Porous domain:Interfacial area density and heat transfer coefficient l.te CFX 2 May 17, 2014 23:45
Coupled Heat Transfer (cond., rad.) MangoMango OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 March 26, 2014 10:14
Convective / Conductive Heat Transfer in Hypersonic flows enigma Main CFD Forum 2 November 1, 2009 22:53
how to model heat transfer for the coupled wall jing113cn FLUENT 0 June 22, 2009 03:56
How can I increase Heat Transfer at Domain Interf? B.Simon CFX 3 October 28, 2008 18:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24.