|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear friends:
I want to know , GMRES and BI_CG_STAB, which is more better. regards |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It depends on your equations, discretization, and preconditioner. You should try both (maybe (TF)QMR as well) with a selection of preconditioners. For most combinations from the following table, there is a matrix for which that combination is significantly better than the others. GMRES is pretty robust and makes a good default.
http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/pe...lvertable.html |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Gmsh] discretizer - gmshToFoam | Andyjoe | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 13 | March 14, 2012 05:35 |
| Comparison: Finite Volume Method vs. Analytic Method | m-fry | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 20, 2010 15:40 |
| Code for most powerfull FDV Method | D.S.Nasan | Main CFD Forum | 6 | September 4, 2008 03:08 |
| Help about the preconditioner in gmres method | Dan Gao | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 5, 2008 02:18 |
| hess-smith method and fvm method | yangqing | FLUENT | 0 | March 20, 2002 20:25 |