
[Sponsors] 
Turbulence model choice for automotive simulation? 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Search this Thread  Display Modes 
December 7, 2015, 04:55 
Turbulence model choice for automotive simulation?

#1 
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 11 
Hello everyone,
I'm doing a simulation (3D, RANS, steady) of a ground vehicle in a windtunnel. The geometry is such that separation should definitely occur at the rear of the vehicle and I'm interested in good prediction of overall drag, the flow separation point, and the wake structure behind the vehicle. What turbulence model would be best for this work? kepsilon? or komega? SST komega? 

December 10, 2015, 17:08 

#2 
Senior Member
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 17 
If you are looking for separation, go with SST komega. Kepsilon does not do well with adverse pressure gradients (the root cause of separation). Komega models do a much better job with separated flow. If you have time I would recommend doing both Shear Stress Transport (SST) and standard komega and compare the differences. Sometimes standard komega will over predict the separation. If you don't have time for this then just stick with SST.


December 10, 2015, 17:14 

#3  
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 11 
Quote:


December 18, 2015, 07:02 

#4 
New Member
Lucas
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 10 
Dear cfdblender,
I agree with the previous comment. The kepsilon model is not the best in terms of aerodynamic considerations (only if you need an accurate turbulent time scale, kepsilon comes in handy). Kw is a good start and also the v2f model family might be a thing to look at. As all of these turbulence models are based on assuming an isotropic viscosity, the results are questionable. If you have time and some experience with it, you could validate the results of kw and SSTkw with a Reynolds Stress Model. This also belongs to RANS simulations but does not assume isotropic conditions of the turbulent viscosity (because it models the Reynolds stresses directly). 

December 18, 2015, 07:46 

#5  
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 11 
Quote:
I'm working with SST Komega. As for RST, I've just looked it up in STAR CCM+ help and it looks like it would be computationally very heavy !  so I'll try it later. 

December 18, 2015, 08:03 

#6 
New Member
Lucas
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 10 
Yes, you are right. The RSM approach has some big drawbacks:
1) Instead of 2 PDEs in a two equation turbulence model you have to solve 7 PDEs (6 for the symmetric Reynolds stress tensor and one for the turbulent dissipation). 2) They are more unstable in terms of convergence. 3) The RSM is not often used these days and if more accurate solutions are needed, people usually switch to LES. I would advise to use it only if you really want to check your twoequation turbulence model for validity. Using it for optimization is just not possible due to the computational effort. 

Tags 
kepsilon, komega, sst komega, turbulence models 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Turbulence Model in axisymmetric nozzle simulation  cric92  FLUENT  5  September 4, 2017 23:35 
General question about SST turbulence model  Richard Renaud  CFD Freelancers  1  December 19, 2015 04:13 
Simulation multiphase airlift reactor with Eulerian multiphase model question????  dilok.kumyoo  FLUENT  0  January 28, 2015 02:15 
Waterwheel shaped turbine inside a pipe simulation problem  mshahed91  CFX  3  January 10, 2015 11:19 
Water subcooled boiling  Attesz  CFX  7  January 5, 2013 03:32 