CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Sod Shock Tube problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 13, 2009, 12:02
Default Sod Shock Tube problem
Posts: n/a
Hi all,

I'm trying to model the Sod Shock Tube Riemann Problem using a Riemann decomposition method. The theory is outlined in EF Toro, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, section 3.1.

The problem consists of an area of density, pressure of 1 and initial velocity of 0.75 on the left of a membrane, and an area with density of 0.125, and pressure of 0.1 with a speed of 0 on the right.

At time zero the membrane is removed.

I'm using a Riemann method to solve the problem, first for the Riemann variables, which is the matrix of right eigenvectors (of the Jacobian matrix of the flux) premultiplied by the variables (rho, rho.u, E)^T where the right eigenvectors are

| 1 , 1 , 1 |

| u-a , u , u+a |

| H -ua , 0.5u^2 , H+ua |

a = soundspeed, H = (E + p)/rho, p = pressure, E = total energy = rho.(0.5u^2 + specific internal energy).

The eigenvalues of this system are (u-a, u, u+a).

For the next timestep.

If the eigenvalue is greater than zero, we take INITOUTPUT(i,k) = INITOUTPUT(i,k)*(1 - EIG(i,k)*(DT/DX)) + EIG(i,k)*(DT/DX)*(INITOUTPUT(i-1,k).

If the eigenvalue is less than zero, we take

INITOUTPUT(i,k) = INITOUTPUT(i,k)*(1 + (DT/DX)*(EIG(i,k)) - EIG(i,k)*(DT/DX)*INITOUTPUT(i+1,k).

Where INITOUTPUT(i,k) are the Riemann variables, i is the x variable.

Then we use a newton solver to solve the non-linear relationship between the Riemann variables and the original variables, (rho, rho.u, E).

Regardless of the timestep or grid spacing, I seem to get the density decreasing smoothly towards the discontinuity over time, then sharply reducing to much lower than the original 0.125 on the right hand side just after the discontinuity and only then going back to the original 0.125. The solution to this problem is well known and not this.

I'm using reflective boundary conditions for the near wall rho(0) = rho(1), u(0) = -u(1), E(0)=E(1) and the same on the far wall.

Can anyone help? I would really appreciate it.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2009, 13:41
Default Re: Sod Shock Tube problem
Mr Bean
Posts: n/a
I advise you to look at "soundtube" software:
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2009, 15:33
Default Re: Sod Shock Tube problem
Posts: n/a
Thanks, but I want to generate my own code. This is part of a project for a PhD.

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 17, 2009, 07:45
Cool Try without the initial velocity
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 17
Hochola is on a distinguished road
Have you tried the test without the initial velocity? Try that first, and you should also have open boundary on both sides. Try ul=0. The star values are shown on pg 133.
Looks like you get a rarefaction wave on the right side of the discont.
Hochola is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 7, 2009, 13:24
Nishant Kumar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 16
Nishu is on a distinguished road

I am dealing with kind of the same problem.
Were you able to figure it out? Reply me at
Nishu is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HLL Riemann Shock Tube Matlab Problem Luke F Main CFD Forum 2 May 20, 2016 02:10
analytical solution of 1D shock tube problem ma Main CFD Forum 10 May 11, 2015 05:20
How to slove shock tube problem with Harten's TVD xialiuyu Main CFD Forum 0 June 17, 2007 00:57
shock tube validation AB Main CFD Forum 3 December 10, 2004 07:31
shock problem arief Main CFD Forum 10 October 22, 1998 19:22

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:32.