CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Which one is better mesh in terms of y+

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 10, 2016, 12:04
Default Which one is better mesh in terms of y+
  #1
Member
 
Iman
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 12
engineer.iman is on a distinguished road
hi,'i have done a mesh Independence study for internal pipe flow in FLUENT.
the flow is turbulent water flow
i have three meshes, the fine and medium quality meshes returned the same y+ value (<20) when i generated the plot for y+
while the coarse mesh resulted in very high value as shown in the attached figure, how should i interpret these results and which one should be the best for k-e model
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Y+ .jpg (75.3 KB, 21 views)
engineer.iman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 10, 2016, 22:01
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
david
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 13
davidwilcox is on a distinguished road
Use the mesh-independent grid that saves you computational costs. The medium one that is. However, I would not look at y plus as a property for mesh independent studies. If you're using a scalable wall function with the k epsilon, y plus will remain at around 11 for fine meshes. It will not change if you were to refine further. Pick a velocity profile and see how that changes with the three meshes. OR... you could look at things like the Richardson extrapolation or GCI( grid convergence index) if you want a more quantitative reasoning.

Last edited by davidwilcox; June 11, 2016 at 02:15.
davidwilcox is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 11, 2016, 10:17
Default
  #3
Member
 
Iman
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 12
engineer.iman is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidwilcox View Post
Use the mesh-independent grid that saves you computational costs. The medium one that is. However, I would not look at y plus as a property for mesh independent studies. If you're using a scalable wall function with the k epsilon, y plus will remain at around 11 for fine meshes. It will not change if you were to refine further. Pick a velocity profile and see how that changes with the three meshes. OR... you could look at things like the Richardson extrapolation or GCI( grid convergence index) if you want a more quantitative reasoning.
thank you very much for your reply.
i actually used the convergence time and the residuals as a basis for selecting the best mesh which in this case the medium one.
but i need to interpret the y+ for each mesh, the medium and fine meshes had the same plot of y+ values however, the coarse mesh was much higher!!!
but one thing i don't understand is why i got so many points for the plot of y+ values for the coarse mesh and should i conclude that a y+ value of less than 25, as in the medium and fine meshes, is considered good or not?
engineer.iman is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sliding mesh problem in CFX Saima CFX 46 September 11, 2021 07:38
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range vaina74 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 37 July 20, 2020 05:38
[ICEM] surface mesh merging problem everest ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 44 April 14, 2016 06:41
[ICEM] Generating Mesh for STL Car in Windtunnel Simulation tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 48 April 15, 2013 04:24
engrid -> save as .stl with boundarie codes Zymon enGrid 31 August 29, 2011 13:40


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:25.