CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Modeling toxic material transport in open environment, but closer to buildings

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 31, 2016, 05:30
Default Modeling toxic material transport in open environment, but closer to buildings
New Member
Sana Ullah
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Daejeon,South Korea
Posts: 28
Blog Entries: 2
Rep Power: 11
Mehar is on a distinguished road
Hi All,

I have a problem in hand, where I have to model toxic material transport in open environment involving wind, but releasing from some hole in a large scale building.
This toxic material could be heavy gases, particles or aerosols, or a mixture of all.
Further, I have to setup some kind of suction system around that building, which can capture this leaking material.
So the objective is to capture toxic material leaking from a building using an appropriately designed suction system, and calculate the capture efficiency
PS: building height, and width is about 80 meters, the domain size in wind direction is more than 1 km.

My question is, which strategy you think is appropriate or better to model this phenomena

(1) Simulate the flow first and then use passive scalar transport in that flow...
(2) Simulate the flow first and then use lagrangian particle tracking (assuming no particle influence on flow)
(3) Simulate the flow and particle transport simultaneously taking care of particle influence on flow also.
(4) Simulate using multiphase flow.

Hope someone can guide, and please let me know, if need more information.
Thank you
Mehar, Phd Scholar
KAIST, Korea
Mehar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 31, 2016, 05:51
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,777
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
your problem is quite complex and the tool depends on what you really wanto to achieve...

The flow is turbulent and the large scale problem prevent using DNS. I don't know if you can try LES. DNS and LES would require a simoultaneous solving of the particle motion.
Maybe URANS can be more affordable for you. However that means you have a statistically averaged velocity field so that a lagrangian tracking follows only the averaged velocity...

Some tracking methods on oceanographic flows use RANS simulation for pollution tracking...
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote


langrangian, mppicfoam, multiphase flows, passive scalar

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 12 March 19, 2018 05:21
Adding material to CFX material library marlon CFX 2 October 16, 2016 09:33
Compression stoke is giving higher pressure than calculated nickjuana CFX 62 May 19, 2015 13:32
Constant velocity of the material Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 08:56
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 12:02

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:08.