CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Inviscid solution gives different results for Constant Density and Incompressible

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 31, 2019, 15:41
Default Inviscid solution gives different results for Constant Density and Incompressible
  #1
New Member
 
Jimmy
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15
wildabyss is on a distinguished road
I'm running Fluent on a very low speed (M~0.05) 3D airplane model using the inviscid mode.

For Materials, I tried both Constant Density (rho = 1.225kg/cu.m) and Incompressible-Ideal-Gas (Po = 101325Pa, MW=28.966kg/kmol, T0=288.15K, so it should give a density of approximately 1.225). However, with Constant Density, I'm getting a CL of 1.22, which is very close to the VLM result; with Incompressible-Ideal-Gas, I'm getting 1.4. The pitching moment is also sufficiently different.

Why the big difference in results? Note that since it's running inviscid solution, the mesh is all tetra and has no prism layer.
wildabyss is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inviscid solution gives different results for Constant Density and Incompressible wildabyss FLUENT 0 October 30, 2019 21:18
Ahmed body simulation gives unexpected results in su2 6.0 anas651 SU2 0 March 28, 2018 03:42
Continuing incompressible results with compressible solver linkamp OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 July 22, 2016 08:54
(incompressible) interFoam - where is the density in the k, epsilon and continuity eq idefix OpenFOAM 0 December 22, 2015 14:40
Help : Algorithm for incompressible variable density flows Meeranandan Main CFD Forum 0 February 6, 2013 06:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:36.