[hokhay]

I am a bit struggling with whether or not to use AMR in steady state subsonic simulation. I do CFD for road car everyday and I use AMR for few years.

I usually set 2 level mesh refinement and perform 2~3 times mesh adaption for each simulation. For some cases, after the second mesh adaption, the solution got back to where before AMR started. Between the first and the last adaption, the solution fluctuates.

I have observed that the fluctuation is cased by the newly refined mesh changes flow field around the car and in the next refinement, the new adapted mesh changes the entire flow field again, so on and so forth. Sometimes it makes the solution cannot convergent because of that.

Is there any guideline of how many times and how frequently the adaption need to be in order to get a reasonable result? In my case, or other bluff body steady state simulation, if after all the AMR, the solution is very close to the solution without AMR, then should I not use it at all but using only a finer mesh region to capture the wake of the car?

Thank you and looking forward to your reply