CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Transiant simulation and experimentation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree24Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 24, 2017, 16:29
Default
  #41
Senior Member
 
dilaw meda
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: algeria
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 8
medaouarwalid is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
The temperature will initially increase but then you will get a statistically energy equilibrium (you don't have a room with adiabatic walls). At that point the statistical steady state is a good approximation.
Thank you for your precious help. I will be back 😁

Sent from my F1f using CFD Online Forum mobile app
medaouarwalid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 31, 2017, 11:04
Default
  #42
Senior Member
 
dilaw meda
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: algeria
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 8
medaouarwalid is on a distinguished road
Hello professors, i hope you remeber me, i took a period of rest and i am back now. I did some changes on the boundary conditions also for the mesh, i am using the default mesh generating by ansys software with little modification on the size of the elements. I used the kepsilon, k omega and RSM models. Here the results on the axial velocity . Numbers of elements was 3.2 million. What can you Say about the results


Sent from my F1f using CFD Online Forum mobile app
medaouarwalid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 31, 2017, 11:55
Default
  #43
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,782
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Not bad, the discrepancy is more relevant for increasing z/D. But one should be sure about the experimental measurements.
medaouarwalid likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 31, 2017, 12:52
Default
  #44
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 292
Rep Power: 13
BlnPhoenix is on a distinguished road
Looking good so far. I think with RANS you can obtain a good solution. As FMDenaro said maybe check measurements again, check the reproducibility of experimental data. From there you can try to make a mesh study. I would say apart from k epsilon the turbulence models look simliar. I would stick to one an try to optimize further. Are you happy so far with the results?
medaouarwalid likes this.
BlnPhoenix is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 31, 2017, 15:27
Default
  #45
Senior Member
 
dilaw meda
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: algeria
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 8
medaouarwalid is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlnPhoenix View Post
Looking good so far. I think with RANS you can obtain a good solution. As FMDenaro said maybe check measurements again, check the reproducibility of experimental data. From there you can try to make a mesh study. I would say apart from k epsilon the turbulence models look simliar. I would stick to one an try to optimize further. Are you happy so far with the results?
Yes i am happy with the results, I will do a mesh study for the three turbulence models . For the experimental data, from the begining i was afraid of the last points because i felt that the mesurements was not so good far away because of some experimental difficulties. After the mesh study i will decide what to do

Sent from my F1f using CFD Online Forum mobile app
medaouarwalid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2017, 07:59
Default
  #46
Senior Member
 
dilaw meda
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: algeria
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 8
medaouarwalid is on a distinguished road
Hi , this is the mesh study for the three turbulence models . Should i do an Other mesh ?


Sent from my F1f using CFD Online Forum mobile app

Last edited by medaouarwalid; September 5, 2017 at 09:08.
medaouarwalid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 7, 2017, 04:25
Default
  #47
Senior Member
 
dilaw meda
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: algeria
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 8
medaouarwalid is on a distinguished road
As you see velocities results were acceptable, my problem now is with the temperature, all points are the same there is no difference or decrease . Any help please !!

Sent from my F1f using CFD Online Forum mobile app
medaouarwalid is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Guide to set initial parameters and settings for external flow simulation amarnath_sivasubramanian FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 1 August 6, 2015 01:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:54.