CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Moving Boundary vs Mesh Translation - Flow past a Cylinder

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 14, 2017, 19:38
Default Moving Boundary vs Mesh Translation - Flow past a Cylinder
  #1
New Member
 
A E
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 10
@E18 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am working on simulation of flow past a cylinder when cylinder is under a forced oscillation. I have a question regarding this case and would like to know your opinions.


To simulate the cylinder oscillation, in order to preserve the mesh quality, I implement the motion to the entire flow domain. This means that the whole domain is oscillating with a velocity field resembles the original cylinder motion. Do you guys think I need to consider any extra terms when calculating the lift force? Currently, I am just integrating the pressure on the cylinder to calculate the lift, but I thought I might miss some other unseen forces due to simplifying the problem.

Thanks,
A E
@E18 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
flow past cylinder, forced vibrations, mesh translation, moving boundaries, star ccm+


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range vaina74 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 37 July 20, 2020 05:38
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 58 July 3, 2020 01:13
Centrifugal fan j0hnny CFX 13 October 1, 2019 13:55
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 6 August 26, 2015 09:38
RPM in Wind Turbine Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 04:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01.