CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

How to do a grid sensitivity studie in a case where a pipe cooling down in a big room

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 25, 2018, 17:23
Default How to do a grid sensitivity studie in a case where a pipe cooling down in a big room
  #1
New Member
 
Xinxin Zhu
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8
Zhudasch is on a distinguished road
Hi everybody. I'm now confused about how to do a grid sensitivity studie in a simulation that includes high-speed free jet (not supersonic) and natural convection.

The case is shown in the picture. To make the things easier I took just a pipe to do the study. The case goes like this: first the pipe will be heated to a stable condition with hot air (700 °C) . The hot air will be exhausted by an air exhaust fan. The maximum velocity in this period is about 140m/s. Then the hot air system will be shut down and the pipe will be cooled down because of natural convection.

I think there are at least 6 parameters I need to study:
1. Which kind of element I use. Polyhedral or Trimmed Cell.
2. The size of Element inside the pipe in both options
3. The configuration of prism layer (the thickness of 1st layer, the total thickness)
4. The refinement of the free jet and natural convection
5. The size of the element on the wall of the laboratory (about 6m*4m*3m).
6. The size of the element on the solid side. The influence on heat transfer.

I don't know how to do such a study with so many variables. Can anyone give me a hint? Like which one I should study first and then use the knowledge to study the second?

Thanks a lot.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Rohr_TC_Large_Geometry Scene 1.jpg (16.0 KB, 12 views)
Zhudasch is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 25, 2018, 17:32
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,772
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
First I think you have to decide the type of formulation you can adopt. As the problem is unsteady and 3D you have to consider your computational resources. The flow appears having a very large Re number and I don't think you can do a DNS. Maybe also LES will be very expensive.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 25, 2018, 17:40
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Xinxin Zhu
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8
Zhudasch is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
First I think you have to decide the type of formulation you can adopt. As the problem is unsteady and 3D you have to consider your computational resources. The flow appears having a very large Re number and I don't think you can do a DNS. Maybe also LES will be very expensive.
Hi FMDenaro, thanks for reply. Until today I've been using the RANS-Models (k-epsilon two-layer all y+). I'd also like to point out, which I forgot to write, that this simulation is transient, at least by cooling. So the grid sensitivity study is really important for the next study of time step.
Zhudasch is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2018, 01:10
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
piu58's Avatar
 
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 15
piu58 is on a distinguished road
I recommend the following:
1) Start with a simulation of both element types. Use a cell size so that the computational resources are comparable. Therefore you don't need values vor a large t.
2) Increase the mesh size by a factor of 1.5. You see how the element types react to changing of the mesh. Select finally one of the element sizes.
3) Mesh the geometry with common sense and observe the max Courant number. Try, how you can decrease it with only small changes in the mesh. So you find out how different regions should be meshed.
4) make three real simulations (to the simulated time you need) with different mesh sizes. I recommend a factor of 1.5 again.
5) Go back to step 3) if you change the physical properties remarkably.
__________________
Uwe Pilz
--
Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950)
piu58 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On grid independent solution for pulsatile flow David FLUENT 5 March 25, 2022 03:33
grid sensitivity test Joe Main CFD Forum 1 January 10, 2007 08:08
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF Fan Main CFD Forum 10 September 9, 2006 12:24
Grid Independence problem for simple pipe geometry chanchala FLUENT 13 November 20, 2003 08:24
fluid flow fundas ram Main CFD Forum 5 June 17, 2000 21:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21.