|
[Sponsors] |
Why decreasing time step makes diffusion more significant for diffusion equation? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 15, 2018, 13:29 |
Why decreasing time step makes diffusion more significant for diffusion equation?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
|
I am trying to solve a simple diffusion equation
where a & b are some given constant, for the sake of simplicity, let's say they are both 1, and the spatial domain is [-1, 1] with periodic BC, the initial condition is numerical delta function . Solving this by simply using a naive schemes: When I compare results from different time step sizes, the smaller the time step size, the more diffusive it appears to be: the wave, or the delta function, spreads out much faster in space (smoothed out) when advance in time, with smaller time step size. But according to the scheme, lowering time step size will obviously reducing the 2nd-order derivative, i.e., the diffusion term, as well, thus it should have lead to less diffusion for smaller . So where does this conflict come from? Thx! Last edited by TurbJet; February 15, 2018 at 14:48. |
|
Tags |
diffusion equation, time step size |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pressure in incompressible solvers e.g. simpleFoam | chrizzl | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | March 28, 2017 05:49 |
simpleFoam error - "Floating point exception" | mbcx4jc2 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | August 4, 2015 02:20 |
Help for the small implementation in turbulence model | shipman | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 25 | March 19, 2014 10:08 |
Micro Scale Pore, icoFoam | gooya_kabir | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 2, 2013 13:58 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 15:33 |