|
[Sponsors] |
April 5, 2000, 14:25 |
Question on Diesel Engines
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This question is for users (and developers) of commercial codes for engine flow simulation.
For a _practical_ diesel engine flow simulation with combustion (or any other engine if you care to comment), what assumptions are you willing to tolerate (and what assumptions are used in the code you use)? Specifically, will the following equations be acceptable (which include quite a few assumptions) If not, then why not? Mass: Dr/Dt + r(Del.u) = 0 (r=density) Assume anelastic flow of a thermally perfect gas: Dr/Dt = -r Beta DT/Dt (Beta=isothermal compressibility) Momentum: rDu/Dt = -Del(p) + mu[ Del^2(u) ] (constant viscosity mu) Energy: (r.c_p)DT/Dt = Del.[ Lam Del(T) ] + Thet Lam = conductivity Thet = source term corresponding to the rate of generation of energy per unit volume Reaction: Shvab-Zel'dovich with all its corresponding assumptions - Arrhenius type, fast single step reaction Thanks in advance Adrin Gharakhani |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unanswered question | niklas | OpenFOAM | 2 | July 31, 2013 16:03 |
Fuel Modelling in Diesel Engines, what's truth | Jo | Siemens | 0 | August 18, 2004 13:47 |
Combustion model in Diesel Engines | roadracer | Siemens | 1 | May 13, 2003 10:05 |
question | K.L.Huang | Siemens | 1 | March 29, 2000 04:57 |
Radiation in diesel engines | Chrys Correa | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 21, 1999 11:36 |