|
[Sponsors] |
Laminar model solves seemingly turbulent flow |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 10, 2018, 04:41 |
Laminar model solves seemingly turbulent flow
|
#1 |
New Member
Novák Martin
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi!
I have to calculate the flow field in a stirred vessel (15 mm radius, 15 mm height) where the blades (10 mm radius) at the top of the geometry rotating with 3000 RPM. It's a transient simulation, and until now I've tried to solve it with SST, since the Reynolds number is around 150000. The convergence is good, but if I want to keep the abs RMS at 1e-5 in every variable, then I have to run it with small stepsize (~1e-6 s) for about 5 seconds. Unfortunately I don't have that much time. First it seemed like an idiotic idea, but I've tried to solve it without any turbulence modelling, and it worked. With 1e-3 s stepsize, the abs RMS in the velocities decresed to 1e-6 and to 1e-4 in the continuity in 10-20 iterations. The results also seem valid. My question is that why the laminar model working in an obviously turbulent case. My mesh consists ~500k elements, so I doubt that I'm in the DNS regime. Should I believe my results? (I'd love to, but not sure) Thanks in advance |
|
Tags |
fluent, laminar, rotating, sst, turbulent |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Laminar transient or Turbulent steady state? | zippostyle | Main CFD Forum | 21 | February 13, 2019 14:13 |
theoretically turbulent but chosen as Laminar Flow | oozcan | FLUENT | 2 | August 18, 2017 07:14 |
Ratio of eddy viscosity to molecular viscosity : Laminar or turbulent flow? | JuPa | CFX | 7 | September 9, 2013 07:45 |
Can I use turbulent model to solve a laminar flow? | nikhil | FLUENT | 5 | February 1, 2011 10:42 |
Is this understanding of turbulence models correct? | 3kha | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 31, 2011 21:31 |