CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

are periodic boundary conditions exact?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 18, 2018, 14:23
Default are periodic boundary conditions exact?
  #1
New Member
 
Theo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 17
holgerbre is on a distinguished road
I try to perform a rather simple simulation: an incompressible flow through a duct using periodic boundary conditions for each velocity component and pressure in streamwise directions. I always considered periodic bcs to be exact. However, looking at the attached in-plane velocity field (underresolved resolution, but that's not the point) i can see structures which are related to the application of the boundary conditions. One can clearly see the vertical blue and red areas on both sides of the domain.



The question is: did i do a mistake in the implementation of the periodic bcs or is there an inherent inaccuracy in the method?


btw, I use a staggered grid and I tried both periodic pressure and pressure gradient with similar result: p_in = p_out and px/dx_in = px/dx_out
Attached Images
File Type: png 2018-12-18-201212_646x369_scrot.png (103.8 KB, 19 views)
holgerbre is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2018, 14:44
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,780
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by holgerbre View Post
I try to perform a rather simple simulation: an incompressible flow through a duct using periodic boundary conditions for each velocity component and pressure in streamwise directions. I always considered periodic bcs to be exact. However, looking at the attached in-plane velocity field (underresolved resolution, but that's not the point) i can see structures which are related to the application of the boundary conditions. One can clearly see the vertical blue and red areas on both sides of the domain.



The question is: did i do a mistake in the implementation of the periodic bcs or is there an inherent inaccuracy in the method?


btw, I use a staggered grid and I tried both periodic pressure and pressure gradient with similar result: p_in = p_out and px/dx_in = px/dx_out





Periodic BCs. are exact but imply a strong condition on the flow and the lenght must be enough to let develop physically the flow structures... looking at your plot the periodicity lenght seems smaller than the extension of the computational domain in streamwise direction, thus I think about a bug in your code.
Note that what is periodic in the pressure field is the fluctuating part that must be superiposed to a constant gradient field.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2018, 14:57
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Theo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 17
holgerbre is on a distinguished road
- right, I use periodic bc for the fluctuating pressure and superimpose it with a constant pressure that drives the flow


- agree, the domain is too small and also the resolution is way too coarse. So the result will be physically wrong. But still, if I implement the bcs correctly, I should not see these structures at the domain borders, or? or can it be related to that?
holgerbre is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2018, 15:02
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,780
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by holgerbre View Post
- right, I use periodic bc for the fluctuating pressure and superimpose it with a constant pressure that drives the flow


- agree, the domain is too small and also the resolution is way too coarse. So the result will be physically wrong. But still, if I implement the bcs correctly, I should not see these structures at the domain borders, or? or can it be related to that?

Structures can appear, passing the BCs. edges and moving along the domain, what I see not correct (and I suppose due to a bug) is the fact you have the same structures at a lenght lower than the periodicity lenght.
However, I strongly suggest to check you code on the analytical Taylor solution before using the duct problem
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2018, 00:15
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Theo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 17
holgerbre is on a distinguished road
you mean a 2D Taylor vortex flow, right? Thanks, I will try that.
holgerbre is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3D Windturbine simulation in SU2 k.vimalakanthan SU2 15 October 12, 2023 05:53
Centrifugal fan-reverse flow in outlet lesds to a mass in flow field xiexing CFX 3 March 29, 2017 10:00
PEMFC module + multiple periodic boundary conditions vkrastev FLUENT 2 December 22, 2014 04:15
Difficulty In Setting Boundary Conditions Moinul Haque CFX 4 November 25, 2014 17:30
Error finding variable "THERMX" sunilpatil CFX 8 April 26, 2013 07:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32.