CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Power boundary condition

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 10, 2019, 05:30
Default Power boundary condition
  #1
Senior Member
 
Raza Javed
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 183
Rep Power: 7
Raza Javed is on a distinguished road
Hello Everyone,

I have a question related to boundary conditions. As we know that we can put different boundary conditions on the inlet and outlet of our geometry.

Is it possible to put power as a boundary condition on the inlet OR on the walls of the geometry? OR If we can derive the power from the existing boundary conditions?

Actually, for my problem, I must give some defined power at the inlet of my geometry, So I want to know the possible way to do that?

Any help will be highly appreciated.

Thank you.
Raza Javed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2019, 08:25
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Your boundary conditions will always be in terms of the primitive variables and their derivatives. For example, in momentum equation it will be velocity and velocity gradients.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raza Javed View Post
Is it possible to put power as a boundary condition on the inlet OR on the walls of the geometry? OR If we can derive the power from the existing boundary conditions?
You need to back-calculate what is the equivalent variables that result in this power since there isn't a power transport equation in traditional CFD. There could be, if you used a power transport equation. Each transport equation is written in terms of some primitive variables, and these are the variables you fix in the boundary conditions.

Power is energy flux. What "energy" are you talking about? Thermal power, mechanical power, etc? And what are the physical mechanisms that transports this power? That determines the the mathematical expressions (in terms of values and their derivatives) that you need to apply.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2019, 08:30
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Raza Javed
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 183
Rep Power: 7
Raza Javed is on a distinguished road
Thank you so much for your reply.



It will be thermal power, that I have to give as an initial boundary condition at the inlet.


Actually, the brief description of my problem is here:


I have a pipe from which some fluid is flowing. At the outside wall of a pipe, I have some electrical devices that are touching the pipe from the outside. The power dissipation of those devices are given and I want to know that how much heat will be transferred to the fluid from these devices and what is the temperature of those devices?
Raza Javed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2019, 11:11
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,768
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
This kind of information could be related as a non-homogeneous Neumann condition for the flow computation. Specifically, the normal derivative of the temperature gradient at the walls k*dT/dn must be prescribed equal to the heat flux that you need to know. But if you have only the power dissipation of the device that is not exactly the heat flux at the wall. It seems you need to model a conjugate heat tranfer process.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2019, 11:13
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Ok so you have a total power in terms of Watts. You need to convert this into a heat flux. To get the heat flux you take the total power and it by the surface area.

If your energy equation is cast in internal energy or enthalpy, then your boundary condition is a enthalpy gradient or internal energy gradient. If your energy equation is written in temperature, then you have more work and need to convert the heat flux into a temperature gradient. Most CFD software will take heat flux as a boundary condition because this is a very common condition. Under-the-hood, the software will convert this value of heat flux into a temperature gradient constraint.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2019, 17:18
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Raza Javed
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 183
Rep Power: 7
Raza Javed is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
Ok so you have a total power in terms of Watts. You need to convert this into a heat flux. To get the heat flux you take the total power and it by the surface area.
Do you mean that I need to multiply the power (watts) with the surface area of the electronic device to convert it to heat flux?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
If your energy equation is cast in internal energy or enthalpy, then your boundary condition is a enthalpy gradient or internal energy gradient. If your energy equation is written in temperature, then you have more work and need to convert the heat flux into a temperature gradient. Most CFD software will take heat flux as a boundary condition because this is a very common condition. Under-the-hood, the software will convert this value of heat flux into a temperature gradient constraint.
What are the parameters that decide which type of energy equation we should have? Either it will be written in terms of internal energy and enthalpy OR it should be in terms of temperature?
Raza Javed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2019, 18:11
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Divide the power by the pipe surface area to get heat flux


The energy transport equation is usually written in terms of either enthalpy, internal energy, or temperature but only one of these these. You have to figure out which one you have.


In general, the energy transport equation can be written in terms of internal energy, enthalpy, and temperature altogether in one equation with constitutive models provided related three to each another. But this is cumbersome because you have to implicitly solve constrained equations and I don't know of any software that actually solves it this way.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2019, 02:55
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Raza Javed
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 183
Rep Power: 7
Raza Javed is on a distinguished road
Thank you so much for your reply.



I have found one article about energy transport equation in terms of internal energy, enthalpy and temperature, but I am not so sure that is exactly what you are talking about.



I am attaching the link below for your reference.


https://www.comsol.com/multiphysics/...tion-of-energy


It would be helpful If you would have a look of this.


Thank you
Raza Javed is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sliding mesh problem in CFX Saima CFX 46 September 11, 2021 07:38
Constant mass flow rate boundary condition sahm OpenFOAM 0 June 20, 2018 22:45
Question about adaptive timestepping Guille1811 CFX 25 November 12, 2017 17:38
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem Sanyo CFX 17 August 15, 2015 06:20
Error finding variable "THERMX" sunilpatil CFX 8 April 26, 2013 07:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:24.