CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Skin friction does not become negative in separation region

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree3Likes
  • 2 Post By FMDenaro
  • 1 Post By Moreza7

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 30, 2020, 07:50
Arrow Skin friction does not become negative in separation region
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 8
Moreza7 is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I have simulated the flow around an airfoil using LES, but I have a problem.
In some articles the skin friction coefficient becomes negative in the laminar separation region, but in my case it just decreases to near zero, but does not become negative. Just like the attached image. Suppose that the red line is mine and black line is for the article which I compare my results to.
Does this mean that the separation is not occured or something else?

Regards.
Moreza7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2020, 08:09
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,777
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moreza7 View Post
Hello,

I have simulated the flow around an airfoil using LES, but I have a problem.
In some articles the skin friction coefficient becomes negative in the laminar separation region, but in my case it just decreases to near zero, but does not become negative. Just like the attached image. Suppose that the red line is mine and black line is for the article which I compare my results to.
Does this mean that the separation is not occured or something else?

Regards.
Are you sure to compare the curves at the same z/c locations or the curves are the mean in spanwise direction? Is your grid enough fine?
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2020, 08:45
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 8
Moreza7 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
Are you sure to compare the curves at the same z/c locations or the curves are the mean in spanwise direction? Is your grid enough fine?
Thanks for your reply.
The grids are the same and the curves are spanwise averaged.
My main questions are:
1- If the skin friction doesn't become negative, does it mean that the separation is not occured?
If yes, then why it does not become negative in turbulent separation region? How can we tell that the separation is occured by observing Cf?
2- Should I calculate the wall stress by du/dy or du/dn?
I used du/dn in this case.
Moreza7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2020, 08:58
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,777
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moreza7 View Post
Thanks for your reply.
The grids are the same and the curves are spanwise averaged.
My main questions are:
1- If the skin friction doesn't become negative, does it mean that the separation is not occured?
If yes, then why it does not become negative in turbulent separation region? How can we tell that the separation is occured by observing Cf?
2- Should I calculate the wall stress by du/dy or du/dn?
I used du/dn in this case.



Evaluating the skin friction or du/dn is the same, you have the tau_wall stress to compute. In your case there is no appearence of a separation point. Are you averaging along z?

And yes, you should use the local reference system (t,n) along the wall so that you compute dut/dn.
Moreza7 and aero_head like this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2020, 23:24
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 8
Moreza7 is on a distinguished road
Thank you.

Yes, as I said, the results are spanwise-averaged along z.

I just noticed that it happened because of the premature numerical trip of boundary layer in CDS. As the mesh is coarse in the upstream of the airfoil.

The problem solved by using blending between CDS and 2nd order upwind in the laminar region and upstream of the airfoil.
aero_head likes this.
Moreza7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
les, separation bubble, skin friction coefficient

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
the skin friction coefficient error from Fluent sutthinan Main CFD Forum 2 November 28, 2012 13:03
[blockMesh] error message with modeling a cube with a hold at the center hsingtzu OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 March 14, 2012 09:56
channelFoam for a 3D pipe AlmostSurelyRob OpenFOAM 3 June 24, 2011 13:06
How to identify flow separation region? Cheng CFX 2 November 29, 2006 07:26
separation region in corner flows submitted to curvature effects Stephane Main CFD Forum 2 July 13, 1998 19:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01.