CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Grid Independence in transient simulation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By FMDenaro

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 30, 2021, 04:19
Exclamation Grid Independence in transient simulation
  #1
New Member
 
h1773's Avatar
 
Time
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
h1773 is on a distinguished road
Hello,

i am performing transient simulation of gas discharging through nozzle from high pressure tank. I want to know how to perform grid independence study in such transient simulation?

Thank you for guidance.
h1773 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2021, 05:18
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,772
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Use a constant CFL number for each refined grid
aero_head and h1773 like this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2021, 05:26
Default
  #3
New Member
 
h1773's Avatar
 
Time
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
h1773 is on a distinguished road
Hello,

Thank you for your response. I am unknown for this kind of simulation..so asking few more questions. Hope you will answer them

i am solving the problem with the segregated pressure based solver. Then what to do?

More over there is convergence issues in this problem i am not able to start solution with coupled or density based solver at even 10-6s time step so compelled to solve the problem with segregated solver and judging the convergence by the pressure, mass and tank variation inside the tank (when the variation below 10-5)…Any advice would be highly appreciable
h1773 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2021, 09:17
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Kira
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 435
Rep Power: 8
aero_head is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by h1773 View Post
Hello,

Thank you for your response. I am unknown for this kind of simulation..so asking few more questions. Hope you will answer them

i am solving the problem with the segregated pressure based solver. Then what to do?

More over there is convergence issues in this problem i am not able to start solution with coupled or density based solver at even 10-6s time step so compelled to solve the problem with segregated solver and judging the convergence by the pressure, mass and tank variation inside the tank (when the variation below 10-5)…Any advice would be highly appreciable
Whether you use a pressure or density based solver does not matter for the CFL condition.

Again, do not just guess your time step, calculate it from the CFL condition for your case. If you must, use adaptive time stepping to hone in on a time step.
aero_head is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2021, 04:41
Default CFL number for segregated pressure based solver
  #5
New Member
 
h1773's Avatar
 
Time
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
h1773 is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I am running simulation in fluent on SIMPLE algorithm the problem is same as above. Courant number is directly available in the case of pressure based coupled solver and density based solver but not in the segregated solver (which are SIMPLE,SIMPLEC etc.). How to find courant number in such cases?
h1773 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2021, 12:04
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Kira
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 435
Rep Power: 8
aero_head is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by h1773 View Post
Hello,
I am running simulation in fluent on SIMPLE algorithm the problem is same as above. Courant number is directly available in the case of pressure based coupled solver and density based solver but not in the segregated solver (which are SIMPLE,SIMPLEC etc.). How to find courant number in such cases?
It is based on your mesh and velocity:

C = \frac{{u}\Delta{t}}{\Delta{x}}

where u is the characteristic wave speed of the system, ∆t is the timestep of the numerical model and ∆x is the spacing of the grid in the numerical model.
aero_head is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2021, 15:13
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Icaro Amorim de Carvalho
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 5
PenPencil is on a distinguished road
I would recommend this for (rigorous) grid convergence: https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/wind/va.../spatconv.html
PenPencil is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
grid convergence, grid convergence study, nozzle flow, nozzle simulation, transient 2d


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mesh independence study for transient simulation snejball91 CFX 9 November 17, 2022 01:12
Transient Simulation in CFX ashtonJ CFX 1 September 28, 2018 01:18
How to make grid for LES simulation dinhanh Main CFD Forum 3 November 11, 2015 02:37
execute udf in ss & transient simulation hosseinhgf FLUENT 0 December 1, 2010 08:41
how to identify transient simulation converged littlelz CFX 5 January 27, 2009 18:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34.