
[Sponsors] 
October 21, 2021, 07:38 
Turbulence model activation

#1 
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 
Hi everybody,
I am a beginner in CFD and have a question about turbulence models in general. As far as I know, I only have to switch on a turbulence model if I expect turbulence in my calculation. Indicator for this is the Reynolds number. But where do I calculate it? As the velocity and the diameter change over a model, the Reynolds number changes as well. Let’s imagine a vortex flow separator with one inlet and two outlets. Do I simply calculate the number at the inlet (where I know the velocity as a boundary condition) and if I have turbulence there I must include a turbulence model? And what happens if my flow at the inlet is laminar, but in the separator turbulence could possibly appear, but I cannot calculate the Reynolds number as I don’t know the velocity in the separator before running the numerical calculation (for which I must know if I need a turbulence model)? And do I need a turbulence model if anywhere in my separator turbulence plays a role? You see, a lot of basic questions that hinder me to progress with my solution. I am happy for any explanation. Thanks in advance! Scaty 

October 21, 2021, 07:55 

#2 
New Member
Jeffrey Johnston
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 5 
Hello Scaty,
I'm certainly no expert, but here's a few thoughts. (I also can't comment on vortex flow separators specifically since I don't know what they are )


October 21, 2021, 08:39 

#3  
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,677
Rep Power: 66 
Quote:
Sorry but this is akin to saying that the most common fluids are air and water when the universe is mostly composed of hydrogen gas, a much lesser amont of helium gas, and some other rarely occurring elements. If you ask an astrophysicist, they'll tell you that most flows in the universe are inviscid. 

October 21, 2021, 09:04 

#4  
New Member
Jeffrey Johnston
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 5 
Quote:


October 21, 2021, 11:07 

#5  
New Member
Jeffrey Johnston
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 5 
Quote:
"Inviscid" does NOT mean laminar. Inviscid flow means the viscous forces are negligible compared to inertial (and other) forces. This is actually a definition of turbulent flow! Of course, it is possible to have inviscid flow that is not turbulent in certain circumstances. This is called potential flow (I think). I'm not an astrophysicist, so I can't comment on whether the potential flow equations are useful in those scenarios. I do know that potential flow can be used in (for example) bulk flow calculations of flow around bodies , but this needs to be combined with turbulent boundary layer theory at the surface of the body. Here's a quote I found in Tennekes and Lumley, A First Course in Turbulence (1972) p. 1: Quote:


October 21, 2021, 11:44 

#6 
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 357
Rep Power: 18 
Referring back to the original question, unless you are writing your own solver then you are going to be limited in what you can actually do. If the turbulence model you are using includes a tripping function the you can try to rely on this to get turbulence started in the flow field correctly  but most turbulence tripping functions are not very reliable for general problems since they are typically tuned for a particular set of conditions. If you have a solver that includes a transition model then you may have more luck in capturing mixed flow behavior (laminar/turbulent in the same flow field). In the old days the basic rule of thumb was that if most of the flowfield was turbulent then run the problem as turbulent, since there were few ways to accurately determine transition.
You can always try running your problem fully turbulent and then fully laminar to see what differences there are. Compute your Reynolds number based on the relevant physical length scale for your problem. It sounds like for your problem that is either going to be the inlet diameter or perhaps something to do with the vortex separator geometry. If you don't know the velocity at the inlet how are you going to set your boundary and initial conditions? 

October 21, 2021, 12:03 

#7 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,780
Rep Power: 71 
One of the misunderstanding is about the direct link of turbulence and a certain Reynolds number.
The very simple case of the flow over a flat plate show you have not a unique value of the Re number. Turbulence develops after a certain position is reached. Consequently, one can generally think about different cases, a fully developed turbulence (that is since from the inflow) or a developing flow where turbulence is generated by something to be described in the computationbal domain. The formulations used to solve such problems are different, not in the turbulence model but in the proper equations (and variables) to solve. In any case, the Re number depends on the scales you are referring. 

October 21, 2021, 12:06 

#8  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,780
Rep Power: 71 
Quote:
Turbulence in inviscid flows is indeed studied. It is more a theoretical framework to study the behavior of some solutions and the inviscid energy transfer. 

October 26, 2021, 18:33 
Done

#9 
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 
Thanks everybody for your answers!
I got it solved to a reasonable level of precision. 

Tags 
inlet, model, reynolds, turbulence 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
[GUIDE] Switching turbulence model to SpalartAllmaras  gabrielfelix  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  1  March 24, 2022 20:19 
Error in Two phase (condensation) modeling  adilsyyed  CFX  15  June 24, 2015 19:42 
Overflow Error in Multiphase Modelling with Two Continuous Fluids  ashtonJ  CFX  6  August 11, 2014 14:32 
An error has occurred in cfx5solve:  volo87  CFX  5  June 14, 2013 17:44 
Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model  FelixL  OpenFOAM Bugs  27  March 27, 2012 09:02 